|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:41e7a1ab@news.povray.org...
> Slime <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote:
>> +C ? Unless you're using radiosity...
>
> At least in the past using +C with radiosity was not a problem.
> If it's a problem currently, it's a bug, imho.
>
I did a +C and it looks ok (even with radiosity), but it happened to crash
right where there is a natural horizontal line in the image, so any problems
wouldn't likely be noticed anyway. It's only a 4-day render, and there are
a couple things that I'm still not 100% happy with, so it will likely be
re-rendered regardless.
But... If I recall correctly, using +C with radiosity was a problem in 3.5.
Is that what you mean? If there was a way around it (short of saving the
radiosity data before doing the render), I was never aware of it. You
basically end-up with a line where the continuation took place. At least,
that's what I recall.
--
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com
|
|