>I think my reply was if anything accurate and in context
with the
>requested information. If time had permitted I would have
provided
>a more a definitive answer.

Sorry Ken, my answer was aimed at Spider's message... I
guessed it missed its target.
I took a look at your list (nice work by the way) and
couldn't find anyone really covering the subject, so I guess
I'll have an addition to your list in a moment (or a bit
longer).

Thanks again

Julius

Post a reply to this message