Julius Klatte wrote:
> 
> >I think my reply was if anything accurate and in context
> with the
> >requested information. If time had permitted I would have
> provided
> >a more a definitive answer.
> 
> Sorry Ken, my answer was aimed at Spider's message... I
> guessed it missed its target.
> I took a look at your list (nice work by the way) and
> couldn't find anyone really covering the subject, so I guess
> I'll have an addition to your list in a moment (or a bit
> longer).
I think I got the point, and I really hope I didn't offend you. That was
not my intention.

-- 
//Spider 
( spi### [at] bahnhofse ) [ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
#declare life = rand(seed(42))*sqrt(-1);

Post a reply to this message