"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
> It would be interesting to see this same scene denoised but without the original
> focal blur--
Oops, what I meant to say was, *with* focal blur (and the inherent noise of low
blur samples) but so that the depth-of-field is much wider and not soft-focus
(if that makes sense.) In other words, noisy but not actually blurry-looking.
I'm wondering if the denoiser can distinguish the ground pattern in the
foreground from the same un-blurred smaller pattern in the receding distance.
Post a reply to this message
|
