Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:

> >
>
> I suggest to use method 3 all right, but with a much lower samples
> value: 600 instead of 1600 is already much faster and without
> significant view deterioration. You can probably even lower it much
> more. With samples 100 the image becomes a bit splotchy though.
>
> --
> Thomas

Here is a version with method 3 and a different color map.
I used 1000 samples and it took 3 days for a 8000*4500 render.
I'm not concinced...


Norbert

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'abstract_neuer25.jpg' (777 KB)

Preview of image 'abstract_neuer25.jpg'