clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 14.02.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Kenneth:
>

> >
> > IDEALLY, as 'depth' increases, the cylinder should stay at the same radius,
> > with the image_map function simply 'eating into' it. But that's not what
> > happens.
>
> That wouldn't be ideal either, as it would /reduce/ the effective radius
> of the entire height_field cylinder on average, creating the opposite
> distorting effect.
>

I was assuming (probably incorrectly) that the image_map itself would always
have *some* pure white areas in it-- which would equate to the max height of the
HF (meaning, the max radius of the HF_Cylinder.) It's that max radius I was
referring to. In experiments I'm doing with two really odd (and dynamic) scaling
equations, I can *almost* get that max radius AND height to stay at set values,
no matter what the 'depth' value. But "almost" isn't quite good enough yet...
:-/

Post a reply to this message