Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> Note that this
> is actually an extension to 3.6 behavior, as it was never documented that
> relative paths would work at all, let alone walking of the directory
> structure using ../.
> The reason is not apparent in 3.7 because there is no code that makes use of
> this feature yet:
I found the "never documented that relative paths would work" interesting, so I
looked it up. You are correct.
But I also found this:
which, talking about 3.1 Library_Path, says,
"Up to twenty unique paths may be specified. If you specify the exact same path
twice it is only counts once."
So, perhaps this path-pruning is older than 3.6?
Post a reply to this message