|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Has anyone considered using cvs for MegaPOV? Would it make sense to do
so?
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov <pet### [at] usanet> wrote:
: Has anyone considered using cvs for MegaPOV? Would it make sense to do
: so?
Why cvs? Why not, for example, prcs?
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27 Jun 2000 04:35:12 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>: Has anyone considered using cvs for MegaPOV? Would it make sense to do
>: so?
>
> Why cvs? Why not, for example, prcs?
I see. Another religious war is coming... Forget I asked anything :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 01:04:30 +0300, Peter Popov wrote:
>>: Has anyone considered using cvs for MegaPOV? Would it make sense to do
>>: so?
>>
>> Why cvs? Why not, for example, prcs?
>
>I see. Another religious war is coming... Forget I asked anything :)
That's the problem with suggesting something within a community; someone
always has a "better solution". :-/
I really don't care about what source control-system is used for official or
unofficial version of pov-ray; as long as it's NOT windows-specific. Anything
which can be used for OS/2, Linux, Solaris, Windows, Amiga, Mac, PC-DOS, etc
is fine.
I really love the povray team's philosophy -- no one is discriminated.
/j
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3958673f@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Why cvs? Why not, for example, prcs?
The POV-Team is already using a (cross-platform, of course) version control
system. So no need to discuss which version control system is best, there
already is one the team agreed on - and which work well, I might add. :-)
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |