 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
We are pleased to announce the release of MegaPOV 1.1.
You can get the compiled versions for Windows, Mac and Linux as well as
the source code from:
http://megapov.inetart.net/
The Windows version comes with an executable that can be slower than
MegaPOV 1.0 in some cases. The reason is POV-Ray 3.6 and versions
based on it can no more be built with MSVC 6 so we have to use
different compilers.
The post processing patch currently is quite slow. This is a problem on
all platforms, we are investigating ways to improve this. You should
consider the post processing feature as highly experimental therefore.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of MegaPOV 1.1.
Excellent news! Thanks guys!
Arlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the release of MegaPOV 1.1.
>
> You can get the compiled versions for Windows, Mac and Linux as well as
> the source code from:
>
> http://megapov.inetart.net/
>
> The Windows version comes with an executable that can be slower than
> MegaPOV 1.0 in some cases. The reason is POV-Ray 3.6 and versions
> based on it can no more be built with MSVC 6 so we have to use
> different compilers.
>
> The post processing patch currently is quite slow. This is a problem on
> all platforms, we are investigating ways to improve this. You should
> consider the post processing feature as highly experimental therefore.
>
> Christoph
>
Thanks.
Willhalm's Bear.pov seems to have a problem (Windows version @ 1280x1024, AA
0.3).
There are parts of the body missing as if there is a CSG error.
What sort of debug data should I send you, or will you test the file
yourself?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Matthews schrieb:
>
> Thanks.
>
> Willhalm's Bear.pov seems to have a problem (Windows version @ 1280x1024, AA
> 0.3).
> There are parts of the body missing as if there is a CSG error.
>
> What sort of debug data should I send you, or will you test the file
> yourself?
>
Looks fine for me, with the same settings.
Arne
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Arne Kleinophorst wrote:
> Daniel Matthews schrieb:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Willhalm's Bear.pov seems to have a problem (Windows version @ 1280x1024,
>> AA 0.3).
>> There are parts of the body missing as if there is a CSG error.
>>
>> What sort of debug data should I send you, or will you test the file
>> yourself?
>>
>
> Looks fine for me, with the same settings.
>
> Arne
Hence the need to debug.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Matthews schrieb:
> Arne Kleinophorst wrote:
>
>
>>Daniel Matthews schrieb:
>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Willhalm's Bear.pov seems to have a problem (Windows version @ 1280x1024,
>>>AA 0.3).
>>>There are parts of the body missing as if there is a CSG error.
>>>
>>>What sort of debug data should I send you, or will you test the file
>>>yourself?
>>>
>>
>>Looks fine for me, with the same settings.
>>
>>Arne
>
>
> Hence the need to debug.
>
I see what you mean. I thought there are actual parts of the Bear
missing. I do also have the strange shapes artifacts.
But I'm not sure if this is of much help for you.
Arne
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> The Windows version comes with an executable that can be slower than
> MegaPOV 1.0 in some cases. The reason is POV-Ray 3.6 and versions
> based on it can no more be built with MSVC 6 so we have to use
> different compilers.
Has someone tried free MS Visual C++ Toolkit 2003?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/
Will MegaPOV compile with it? Docs do not mention it, so I guess that
answer is no?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christoph Hormann wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the release of MegaPOV 1.1.
Irregardless of the lamets, I'm very pleased!
Arlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I render the camera_view desk sample scene, the picture on the desk
seems to have a small patch at the bottom right corner that is brighter for
some reason, but the main image does not have this patch of brightness. Is
this supposed to be like this and if so, what causes it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Allen <bri### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> When I render the camera_view desk sample scene, the picture on the desk
> seems to have a small patch at the bottom right corner that is brighter for
> some reason, but the main image does not have this patch of brightness. Is
> this supposed to be like this and if so, what causes it.
I can not see what you mean.
The image looks fine to me.
Keep in mind that there are reflections on the image on the desk.
Could you post/mail an image where you mark the spot?
Yvo
--
-----------------------------------
MegaPOV at: http://megapov.inetart.net
MacMegaPOV at: http://users.skynet.be/smellenbergh
E-mail: yvo### [at] gmxnet
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
