 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Warp
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 13 Sep 2001 04:55:46
Message: <3ba07491@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mr. Art <mra### [at] chesapeake net> wrote:
: Is it something with POVRay or PSP?
Does the image file size grow when you use more bits per pixel? If so,
that's a quite clear sign that povray is working ok.
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After I posted, I checked the file size, and yes, POV
is doing the right stuff. Why I get the same report
for every png image is still a mystery to me though.
Warp wrote:
>
> Mr. Art <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote:
> : Is it something with POVRay or PSP?
>
> Does the image file size grow when you use more bits per pixel? If so,
> that's a quite clear sign that povray is working ok.
>
> --
> #macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
> rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
> ],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
> 7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jan Walzer
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 13 Sep 2001 13:22:41
Message: <3ba0eb61@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mr. Art" <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote:
> After I posted, I checked the file size, and yes, POV
> is doing the right stuff. Why I get the same report
> for every png image is still a mystery to me though.
that's the import filter of PSP
PSP doesn't know that there are more than 24 bits ...
the filters always decrease the colordepth to a maximum of 16,7M...
no way around ...
--
Jan Walzer <jan### [at] lzernet>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bugger!
Jan Walzer wrote:
>
> "Mr. Art" <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote:
>
> > After I posted, I checked the file size, and yes, POV
> > is doing the right stuff. Why I get the same report
> > for every png image is still a mystery to me though.
>
> that's the import filter of PSP
> PSP doesn't know that there are more than 24 bits ...
> the filters always decrease the colordepth to a maximum of 16,7M...
> no way around ...
>
> --
> Jan Walzer <jan### [at] lzernet>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 14 Sep 2001 08:02:55
Message: <3ba1f1ef$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mr. Art" <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote in message
news:3BA2262D.496D39DC@chesapeake.net...
> Bugger!
Technical term...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: ben paschke
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 15 Sep 2001 22:16:06
Message: <3BA40BE3.71C7F09C@rsp.com.au>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nothing Real's Shake.
www.nothingreal.com
lovely!
benp
rising sun pictures
www.rsp.com.au
Glen Berry wrote:
>
> Ok, after getting a good dose of negative comments about trying to
> make POV-Ray and Photoshop more compatible, in regards to 48bpp
> images, I have one burning question in my mind:
>
> What image editor (available for Windows) will open and properly edit
> a POV-Ray 48bpp image?
>
> By "properly", I mean it will open the image in 48bpp mode, not 24bpp.
> It will be able to perform "curves" and "levels" operations on the
> 48bpp image. It offers a 24bpp preview on my monitor. It can convert
> the 48bpp image to a standard 24bpp file, after I am done tweaking the
> curves or levels.
>
> So what software do I use? What software do *you* use?
>
> I'd really like to know.
>
> Thanks,
> Glen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Nikodemus Siivola
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 16 Sep 2001 07:02:11
Message: <3ba486b3$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ben paschke" <ben### [at] rspcomau> wrote:
> Nothing Real's Shake.
> www.nothingreal.com
And costs $9.900 :(
-- Nikodemus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Technical? From my Book of Choice Words:
"Bugger: equivalent to "Rats","Drat","Dang", and a few different
Choice Words that relate to defecation. Not to be confused with
other, stronger Choice Words that relate to sexual functions
and/or acts or Choice Phrases like "Bloody Hell".
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> "Mr. Art" <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote in message
> news:3BA2262D.496D39DC@chesapeake.net...
> > Bugger!
>
> Technical term...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Scott Hill
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 17 Sep 2001 12:23:29
Message: <3ba62381@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mr. Art" <mra### [at] chesapeakenet> wrote in message
news:3BA4BF28.7A343156@chesapeake.net...
> Technical? From my Book of Choice Words:
>
> "Bugger...
> ...Not to be confused
with
> other, stronger Choice Words that relate to sexual functions
> and/or acts...
>
Though, is in fact a 'Choice Word' that refers to a sexual act...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tom Melly
Subject: Re: What software do *YOU* open and edit 48bpp images with?
Date: 18 Sep 2001 10:05:56
Message: <3ba754c4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Scott Hill" <nos### [at] nospamthanks> wrote in message
news:3ba62381@news.povray.org...
> Though, is in fact a 'Choice Word' that refers to a sexual act...
>
Yes, this has often puzzled me - why is "bugger" so innocuous, but not f*ck?
Follow-ups set... (Ooo, I've always wanted to say that).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
