|
 |
Alessandro Coppo wrote:
>
> Francois Labreque wrote:
>
> > Long enough for you to realize that there is no language called C/C++.
>
> C++ exists (get Stroustrup book) it is just that NO compiler development
> team is FORCED to comply to the definition.
I didn't say C++ didn't exist. I said "C/C++" doesn't exist. I was
merely trying to point out that they're two separate languages.
--
Francois Labreque | It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it
flabreque | is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
@ | the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a
videotron.ca | warning, it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in
| motion.
- Stolen from Badger's .sig file
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Francois Labreque wrote:
> I didn't say C++ didn't exist. I said "C/C++" doesn't exist. I was
> merely trying to point out that they're two separate languages.
...and thanks to C99 standard efforts, the gap is getting wider!
W.r.t. Pov4, I advise to have a look at www.wxwindows.org. They have
developed a C++ toolkit which compiles on lots of platforms: their
C++ usage tradeoffs are without doubt a good starting point.
If you plan to use STL, STLPort (www.stlport.org) manages to compile
on lots of platforms.
Bye!!!
Alessandro Coppo
a.c### [at] iol it
P.S.: if the "more open collaboration style" is really going to happen,
consider me already enlisted.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
