 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gawrsh, I seem to have touched off a huge argument about the nature of the text
object enhancements. I guess that particular example hit some resonant chord, which
was not my intent. The original question had to do more with the excluded features
(which I will not name for fear of a flareup <g>), and whether or not we could
expect to see them in a future release when they became more stable.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:48:57 -0400, Dave Dunn wrote:
>
>Gawrsh, I seem to have touched off a huge argument about the nature of the text
>object enhancements. I guess that particular example hit some resonant chord, which
>was not my intent. The original question had to do more with the excluded features
>(which I will not name for fear of a flareup <g>), and whether or not we could
>expect to see them in a future release when they became more stable.
I think the plan is for no more 3.x versions after 3.5. 4.0 will be a complete
rewrite, so the chance of useful features being included is probably pretty
high.
--
#macro R(L P)sphere{L F}cylinder{L P F}#end#macro P(V)merge{R(z+a z)R(-z a-z)R(a
-z-z-z a+z)torus{1F clipped_by{plane{a 0}}}translate V}#end#macro Z(a F T)merge{
P(z+a)P(z-a)R(-z-z-x a)pigment{rgbf 1}hollow interior{media{emission 3-T}}}#end
Z(-x-x.2x)camera{location z*-10rotate x*90normal{bumps.02scale.05}}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov 0.8
based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
Hope this makes you sleep. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
JRG <jrg### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
: MegaPov 0.8
I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has been used and a new version
should be released... :)
--
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has been used and a
new version
> should be released... :)
0.10 ? :-)
(Well thats the problem when I count, folders, for example:
files_1,files_2,...,files_9,files_10 - and now: sort it!)
cukk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" wrote:
> I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has
> been used and a new version should be released... :)
After 0.9.0 comes 0.10.0
...or the short version: after 0.9 comes 0.10
;)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b72ce3e@news.povray.org> , "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov 0.8
> based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
> Hope this makes you sleep. ;)
I expect features that are redundant won't be future versions of MegaPOV
either...
Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post Processing is redundant?!
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b730b5c@news.povray.org...
> In article <3b72ce3e@news.povray.org> , "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
> > Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov
0.8
> > based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
> > Hope this makes you sleep. ;)
>
> I expect features that are redundant won't be future versions of MegaPOV
> either...
>
> Thorsten
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:
> Post Processing is redundant?!
Who said anything about post processing?
Thorsten only said redundant features (such as text object alignment)
probably won't be included, which makes perfect sense. The post_process
patch hadn't even been mentioned in this thread before your message.
--
Christopher James Huff - chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Forget redundant, the update page says that it won't be included.
So perhaps there will be a way that Post Processing can be reintroduced
in a future 3.5 based MegaPOV.
Chris Huff wrote:
>
> In article <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom>
> wrote:
>
> > Post Processing is redundant?!
>
> Who said anything about post processing?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
