POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : 3.6? Server Time
20 Jul 2024 18:21:51 EDT (-0400)
  3.6? (Message 11 to 20 of 38)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: JRG
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 9 Aug 2001 13:54:06
Message: <3b72ce3e@news.povray.org>
Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov 0.8
based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
Hope this makes you sleep. ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 9 Aug 2001 14:47:19
Message: <3b72dab6@news.povray.org>
JRG <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
: MegaPov 0.8

  I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has been used and a new version
should be released... :)

-- 
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}//                     - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

From: KalleK
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 9 Aug 2001 15:55:07
Message: <3b72ea9b@news.povray.org>
>   I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has been used and a
new version
> should be released... :)

0.10 ? :-)

(Well thats the problem when I count, folders, for example:
files_1,files_2,...,files_9,files_10 - and now: sort it!)

cukk


Post a reply to this message

From: Rune
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 9 Aug 2001 16:18:25
Message: <3b72f011@news.povray.org>
"Warp" wrote:
>   I'm waiting to see what will he do when 0.9 has
> been used and a new version should be released... :)

After 0.9.0 comes 0.10.0

...or the short version: after 0.9 comes 0.10

;)

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:    http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated June 26)
POV-Ray Users:   http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 9 Aug 2001 18:14:52
Message: <3b730b5c@news.povray.org>
In article <3b72ce3e@news.povray.org> , "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov 0.8
> based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
> Hope this makes you sleep. ;)

I expect features that are redundant won't be future versions of MegaPOV
either...

    Thorsten


Post a reply to this message

From: JRG
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 10 Aug 2001 06:13:06
Message: <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>
Post Processing is redundant?!

"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:3b730b5c@news.povray.org...
> In article <3b72ce3e@news.povray.org> , "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>
> > Don't worry, my little friend. Nathan will save us all with a MegaPov
0.8
> > based on POV 3.5 with all those features.
> > Hope this makes you sleep. ;)
>
> I expect features that are redundant won't be future versions of MegaPOV
> either...
>
>     Thorsten


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 10 Aug 2001 11:39:50
Message: <chrishuff-55FCFE.10371410082001@netplex.aussie.org>
In article <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> 
wrote:

> Post Processing is redundant?!

Who said anything about post processing?
Thorsten only said redundant features (such as text object alignment) 
probably won't be included, which makes perfect sense. The post_process 
patch hadn't even been mentioned in this thread before your message.

-- 
Christopher James Huff - chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Mr  Art
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 11 Aug 2001 08:05:16
Message: <3B7557F0.CFFDD7CA@chesapeake.net>
Forget redundant, the update page says that it won't be included.
So perhaps there will be a way that Post Processing can be reintroduced
in a future 3.5 based MegaPOV.

Chris Huff wrote:
> 
> In article <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom>
> wrote:
> 
> > Post Processing is redundant?!
> 
> Who said anything about post processing?


Post a reply to this message

From: JRG
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 11 Aug 2001 08:45:48
Message: <3b7528fc@news.povray.org>
But, IIRC, it won't be included in POV 3.5. The thread was about features
which aren't going to be included in the official version of pov.

"Chris Huff" <chr### [at] maccom> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:chr### [at] netplexaussieorg...
> In article <3b73b3b2@news.povray.org>, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom>
> wrote:
>
> > Post Processing is redundant?!
>
> Who said anything about post processing?
> Thorsten only said redundant features (such as text object alignment)
> probably won't be included, which makes perfect sense. The post_process
> patch hadn't even been mentioned in this thread before your message.
>
> --
> Christopher James Huff - chr### [at] maccom,
http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
> TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/
>
> <><


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: 3.6?
Date: 11 Aug 2001 10:34:57
Message: <3b754291@news.povray.org>
JRG <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
: But, IIRC, it won't be included in POV 3.5. The thread was about features
: which aren't going to be included in the official version of pov.

  But the reason for not including post-processing is not that it's redundant.
  Redundancy is not the only reason for excluding features.

-- 
#macro N(D,I)#if(I<6)cylinder{M()#local D[I]=div(D[I],104);M().5,2pigment{
rgb M()}}N(D,(D[I]>99?I:I+1))#end#end#macro M()<mod(D[I],13)-6,mod(div(D[I
],13),8)-3,10>#end blob{N(array[6]{11117333955,
7382340,3358,3900569407,970,4254934330},0)}//                     - Warp -


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.