|
|
While porting MegaPov 0.6 to PVM, I ran every possible scene in the
demos06.zip archive, and got a segmentation fault in the
photons/spherecyl.pov scene. It seems to come form an uninitialised
array in png_pov.c, line 1821.
Trying the same scene with megapov 0.5a, I got the same problem.
Could anybody confirm and/or explain this?
TIA.
--
__ __ __ __ _
| | / \ / / |_ / |/
\/\/ \__/ /_ /_ |__ \_ |\
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Francois Dispot wrote:
>
> While porting MegaPov 0.6 to PVM, I ran every possible scene in the
> demos06.zip archive, and got a segmentation fault in the
> photons/spherecyl.pov scene. It seems to come form an uninitialised
> array in png_pov.c, line 1821.
>
> Trying the same scene with megapov 0.5a, I got the same problem.
> Could anybody confirm and/or explain this?
I tested this file with MegaPOV 0.5a and POV-Ray 3.1g (when all
the photon-related stuff is commented out).
Linux RedHat 6.1 (2.2.12-20smp) :
- MegaPOV crashed at the point described above.
- POV works fine with official compile (static libpng ?) and
unofficial compile with dynamic libpng.
SGI IRIX 6.5 :
- both works (POV is unofficial compile)
Digital UNIX V4.0F :
- MegaPOV Floating exception when starting render (X display is open)
so it is again something different (I didn't trace that crash yet).
- POV works (unofficial compile)
Guess what ? Needs some works around ;-)
<french>
BTW, ton boulot sur PvMegaPOV est super, mais je n'ai malheureusement
jamais pu installer PVM sur nos machines (suis pas root). Quid d'une version
MPI ? {hehehehe}
</french>
*** Nicolas Calimet
*** http://pov4grasp.free.fr
Post a reply to this message
|
|
|
|
Nicolas Calimet wrote in message <39E0DD2D.D6E1651D@free.fr>...
> Digital UNIX V4.0F :
> - MegaPOV Floating exception when starting render (X display is open)
>so it is again something different (I didn't trace that crash yet).
> - POV works (unofficial compile)
Try looking at the random number generator. With some compilers, it
produces numbers outside the range of [0, 1)
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|