POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Radiosity feature suggestion Server Time
1 Nov 2024 21:21:15 EDT (-0400)
  Radiosity feature suggestion (Message 1 to 10 of 11)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: TonyB
Subject: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 14 May 2000 13:15:17
Message: <391edf25@news.povray.org>
I came up with this idea while talking to Mark Wagner on ICQ yesterday. I
was trying to figure out the radiosity settings that Nathan provides, and
discovered I was clueless about brightest_ambient_object. I was using
totally incorrect numbers, and Mark cleared this up for me. What I am
proposing is the following: How about adding some way of making this value
be automatically calculated for adc_bailout? You know, like adding the
keyword "auto" after adc_bailout, or something like that. Could it be done?
Would it help?


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 15 May 2000 06:54:18
Message: <391fd75a@news.povray.org>
I think this is a good idea (if it can be done).

  The more values that are automatically calculated (but of course modifiable
by hand when needed), the better.
  If the automatically calculated value is bad for a certain scene, you can
fine-tune it by hand, but if the program can automatically calculate a good
value which works for most scenes, that would make it a lot easier to use.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Wilson
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 15 May 2000 09:08:26
Message: <391FF698.81E8B2C@iastate.edu>
Can you share what you learned with us?

Mike Wilson

TonyB wrote:

> I came up with this idea while talking to Mark Wagner on ICQ yesterday. I
> was trying to figure out the radiosity settings that Nathan provides, and
> discovered I was clueless about brightest_ambient_object. I was using
> totally incorrect numbers, and Mark cleared this up for me.


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 15 May 2000 19:23:21
Message: <392086e9@news.povray.org>
brightest_ambient_object = average of the RGB of the brightest color times
its diffuse. Quoting from Mark Wagner's message to me, this means:

"An object with a color of < 1, 0.5, 0.5 > and a diffuse of 0.8 would have
an average color of 2/3 and a total brightness of 8/15 or 0.53.  An object
with a color of < 2, 2, 2 > and a diffuse of 0.25 would have an average
color of 2 and a total brightness of 0.5.  If your scene consisted of only
those two objects, you would use 0.53 for the brightest_ambient_object."


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 15 May 2000 20:26:08
Message: <392095a0$1@news.povray.org>
Of course, if the light source you use had a brightness of 1.5 instead of
1.0, then you'd want to use 0.53 * 1.5 for that value.

-Nathan

TonyB <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote...
> brightest_ambient_object = average of the RGB of the brightest color times
> its diffuse. Quoting from Mark Wagner's message to me, this means:
>
> "An object with a color of < 1, 0.5, 0.5 > and a diffuse of 0.8 would have
> an average color of 2/3 and a total brightness of 8/15 or 0.53.  An object
> with a color of < 2, 2, 2 > and a diffuse of 0.25 would have an average
> color of 2 and a total brightness of 0.5.  If your scene consisted of only
> those two objects, you would use 0.53 for the brightest_ambient_object."
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 16 May 2000 04:59:56
Message: <39210e0c@news.povray.org>
All this is good to know.  I too was wondering about it.

Bob

"Nathan Kopp" <Nat### [at] Koppcom> wrote in message news:392095a0$1@news.povray.org...
{ Of course, if the light source you use had a brightness of 1.5 instead of
{ 1.0, then you'd want to use 0.53 * 1.5 for that value.
{ 
{ -Nathan
{ 
{ TonyB <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote...
{ > brightest_ambient_object = average of the RGB of the brightest color times
{ > its diffuse. Quoting from Mark Wagner's message to me, this means:
{ >
{ > "An object with a color of < 1, 0.5, 0.5 > and a diffuse of 0.8 would have
{ > an average color of 2/3 and a total brightness of 8/15 or 0.53.  An object
{ > with a color of < 2, 2, 2 > and a diffuse of 0.25 would have an average
{ > color of 2 and a total brightness of 0.5.  If your scene consisted of only
{ > those two objects, you would use 0.53 for the brightest_ambient_object."
{ >


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Wilson
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 16 May 2000 09:12:08
Message: <39214920.4B8A8F60@iastate.edu>
If you have multiple light_sources do you just use the value of the brightest
one in your calculations, or do you need to figure each one's contribution and
find an average or something?

Mike Wilson

Nathan Kopp wrote:

> Of course, if the light source you use had a brightness of 1.5 instead of
> 1.0, then you'd want to use 0.53 * 1.5 for that value.
>
> -Nathan
>
> TonyB <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote...
> > brightest_ambient_object = average of the RGB of the brightest color times
> > its diffuse. Quoting from Mark Wagner's message to me, this means:
> >
> > "An object with a color of < 1, 0.5, 0.5 > and a diffuse of 0.8 would have
> > an average color of 2/3 and a total brightness of 8/15 or 0.53.  An object
> > with a color of < 2, 2, 2 > and a diffuse of 0.25 would have an average
> > color of 2 and a total brightness of 0.5.  If your scene consisted of only
> > those two objects, you would use 0.53 for the brightest_ambient_object."
> >
> >


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 16 May 2000 09:39:49
Message: <39214fa4@news.povray.org>
Mike Wilson <maw### [at] iastateedu> wrote:
: If you have multiple light_sources do you just use the value of the brightest
: one in your calculations, or do you need to figure each one's contribution and
: find an average or something?

  And of course it will not be the same thing if the light sources are both
illuminating the same side of the object or opposite sides...

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 16 May 2000 17:44:44
Message: <3921c14c@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:39214fa4@news.povray.org...
{ Mike Wilson <maw### [at] iastateedu> wrote:
{ : If you have multiple light_sources do you just use the value of the brightest
{ : one in your calculations, or do you need to figure each one's contribution and
{ : find an average or something?
{ 
{   And of course it will not be the same thing if the light sources are both
{ illuminating the same side of the object or opposite sides...
{ 

Sounds a bit more complicated now.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: Radiosity feature suggestion
Date: 16 May 2000 21:07:55
Message: <3921f0eb@news.povray.org>
To make it easier, simply estimate on the bright side (for adc_bailout).
That might decrease speed, but will help image quality.

-Nathan

Bob Hughes <per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote...
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:39214fa4@news.povray.org...
> { Mike Wilson <maw### [at] iastateedu> wrote:
> { : If you have multiple light_sources do you just use the value of the
brightest
> { : one in your calculations, or do you need to figure each one's
contribution and
> { : find an average or something?
>

> {   And of course it will not be the same thing if the light sources are
both
> { illuminating the same side of the object or opposite sides...
>

>
> Sounds a bit more complicated now.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.