POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : UVPov 6.1 Server Time
2 Nov 2024 13:21:39 EDT (-0400)
  UVPov 6.1 (Message 1 to 10 of 12)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>
From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: UVPov 6.1
Date: 6 Nov 1999 01:12:14
Message: <3823c6be@news.povray.org>
Well, I've uploaded UVPov 6.1.  Lots of bug fixes.  Plus photons in media.
:-)

Have fun.  And continue with the polite and informative bug reports
(including demo scenes).  They do help a lot.

-Nathan


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 6 Nov 1999 10:25:48
Message: <3824487c@news.povray.org>
Goooo, Naaaathan!!! Hoo! Hoo! Hoo!... =)


Post a reply to this message

From: Margus Ramst
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 6 Nov 1999 20:15:04
Message: <3824D34C.9C5C201F@peak.edu.ee>
Dammit, and I had some important work to do...
Oh well, it will have to wait. Gotta see them photons in media!

Margus

Nathan Kopp wrote:
> 
> Well, I've uploaded UVPov 6.1.  Lots of bug fixes.  Plus photons in media.
> :-)
> 
> Have fun.  And continue with the polite and informative bug reports
> (including demo scenes).  They do help a lot.
> 
> -Nathan


Post a reply to this message

From: Nieminen Juha
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 7 Nov 1999 07:08:05
Message: <38256ba5@news.povray.org>
No fractal patch included?

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 7 Nov 1999 08:37:18
Message: <3825808e@news.povray.org>
I think that would require a bigger version change, like 7.0.


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 7 Nov 1999 16:08:08
Message: <3825ea38@news.povray.org>
I wanted to clobber those bugs, first (before potentially introducing more).
And I had already started on media photons.  Adding the fractal patch will
probably be in versio 6.2 (version 7.0 should hopefully include a bunch of
superpatch features... provided days start lasting 26 hours).

-Nathan

TonyB <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote...
> I think that would require a bigger version change, like 7.0.
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Fabian Brau
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 8 Nov 1999 03:09:11
Message: <38268590.2CDE8E13@umh.ac.be>
Hello Nathan!

You are very fast to correct bug!!! Personally, I appreciate very much
:)!!!

Fabian.

Nathan Kopp wrote:
> 
> Well, I've uploaded UVPov 6.1.  Lots of bug fixes.  Plus photons in media.
> :-)
> 
> Have fun.  And continue with the polite and informative bug reports
> (including demo scenes).  They do help a lot.
> 
> -Nathan


Post a reply to this message

From: Nieminen Juha
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 8 Nov 1999 05:51:44
Message: <3826ab40@news.povray.org>
Btw, I still can't find any reference to the ini_option command in the
documentation.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 8 Nov 1999 08:53:19
Message: <3826d5cf@news.povray.org>
Writing documentation is so much less fun than writing code.  Anyway, I'll
document it soon (it's on my to-do list).

-Nathan

Nieminen Juha <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote...
>   Btw, I still can't find any reference to the ini_option command in the
> documentation.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Nieminen Juha
Subject: Re: UVPov 6.1
Date: 8 Nov 1999 11:08:00
Message: <3826f560@news.povray.org>
Nathan Kopp <Nat### [at] koppcom> wrote:
: Writing documentation is so much less fun than writing code.  Anyway, I'll
: document it soon (it's on my to-do list).

  Thanx :)

  Btw, I compiled the newest version of uvpov in this Solaris Sparcstation.
Your //-comments caused lots of trouble. There's no easy way to automatically
replace them with /* ... */. One problem is that some of the //-comments
are inside a bigger /**/-comment block, so replacing the //-comments breaks
the bigger block.
  One possibility is just to automatically remove the //-comments, but that
might cause some problems too...
  You have some very tricky comment lines like the line 1028 in cones.c:

  //*/

  It's not trivial for a line-by-line filter to see whether that is the
beginning of an //-comment or the end of an /*...*/ comment.
  Also the http:// lines cause headache to the filtering.

  Would it be too much asked if you could fix this?

  The result was that I got most of the comments working by filtering, but
had to make some modifications by hand before it was completely fixed.

  The lack of ending newline at the end of radiosit.c also caused problems
with the filtering (I still don't know why).

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.