 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What are the differences? Advantages? Disadvantages? I have both and
am juts wondering
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> What are the differences? Advantages? Disadvantages? I have both and
> am juts wondering
Differences:
SuperPatch: many patches in one
UVPOV: Nathan Kopp's patches in one
Advantages:
SuperPatch: many patches in one
UVPOV: photon mapping, uv mapping, etc. etc.
Disadvantages:
They are not in one patch (yet).
Did that answer your questions?
--
Anthony L. Bennett
http://welcome.to/TonyB
Non nova, sed nove.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
> > What are the differences? Advantages? Disadvantages? I have both and
> > am juts wondering
>
> Differences:
> SuperPatch: many patches in one
> UVPOV: Nathan Kopp's patches in one
>
> Advantages:
> SuperPatch: many patches in one
> UVPOV: photon mapping, uv mapping, etc. etc.
>
> Disadvantages:
> They are not in one patch (yet).
>
> Did that answer your questions?
>
> --
> Anthony L. Bennett
> http://welcome.to/TonyB
>
> Non nova, sed nove.
Is it possible to use both on one picture? Like parse the scene in one
binary and then the other to utilize both binaries?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
MSP wrote:
> Is it possible to use both on one picture? Like parse the scene in one
> binary and then the other to utilize both binaries?
No.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:09:37 -0400, MSP wrote:
>Is it possible to use both on one picture? Like parse the scene in one
>binary and then the other to utilize both binaries?
Ken already said no, but I just wanted to add some historical perspective:
It was just that question that got me started on the whole superpatch
idea in the first place, because it wasn't possible before. Now it seems
to have taken on a life of its own. I never cease to be impressed by what
people are doing with a handful of extra stuff.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 09:09:37 -0400, MSP wrote:
> >Is it possible to use both on one picture? Like parse the scene in one
> >binary and then the other to utilize both binaries?
>
> Ken already said no, but I just wanted to add some historical perspective:
> It was just that question that got me started on the whole superpatch
> idea in the first place, because it wasn't possible before. Now it seems
> to have taken on a life of its own. I never cease to be impressed by what
> people are doing with a handful of extra stuff.
So are there any plans for a future collabrative with both UvPov and
Superpatch?
for povray 3.1g?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
MSP wrote:
> So are there any plans for a future collabrative with both UvPov and
> Superpatch?
> for povray 3.1g?
Nathan Kopp is currently working to merge the two patches together but there
is no release date available that I am aware of.
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:10:02 -0700, Ken wrote:
>
>
>MSP wrote:
>
>> So are there any plans for a future collabrative with both UvPov and
>> Superpatch?
>> for povray 3.1g?
>
>Nathan Kopp is currently working to merge the two patches together but there
>is no release date available that I am aware of.
Nathan sent me the results of that work, so now the release is on my
shoulders. As everyone knows by now, that means it'll only happen
after everyone has despaired of it ever happening. :)
I haven't merged in the g sources yet. I'll need to remember to do
that too.
Okay, y'all, time to help out if you can: does anyone know a decent
scheduling/project planning program that can embed an email or a
Usenet message, including attachments, into a subproject description?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
If you have Windows here's a heck of a site with several possibilities
it seems. I just don't know anything of it. AY Mail looked right, but
there's a bunch there.
http://www.abest.com/mirrors/xiaomu/WWW/winsock/win95/email.htm
Ron Parker wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:10:02 -0700, Ken wrote:
> >
> >
> >MSP wrote:
> >
> >> So are there any plans for a future collabrative with both UvPov and
> >> Superpatch?
> >> for povray 3.1g?
> >
> >Nathan Kopp is currently working to merge the two patches together but there
> >is no release date available that I am aware of.
>
> Nathan sent me the results of that work, so now the release is on my
> shoulders. As everyone knows by now, that means it'll only happen
> after everyone has despaired of it ever happening. :)
>
> I haven't merged in the g sources yet. I'll need to remember to do
> that too.
>
> Okay, y'all, time to help out if you can: does anyone know a decent
> scheduling/project planning program that can embed an email or a
> Usenet message, including attachments, into a subproject description?
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
--
>Ron Parker wrote:
....
>> Okay, y'all, time to help out if you can: does anyone know a decent
>> scheduling/project planning program that can embed an email or a
>> Usenet message, including attachments, into a subproject description?
not what you're looking for, but maybe helpfull
http://www.cypressnet.com/Products/msgparse/msgparse.htm
ingo
--
Met dank aan de muze met het glazen oog.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
