POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.tools.poser : Plump Ken Server Time
17 May 2024 05:07:40 EDT (-0400)
  Plump Ken (Message 5 to 14 of 34)  
<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: St 
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 07:35:45
Message: <46518411@news.povray.org>
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote in message 
news:web.46517cf43b48260fc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...

  Thanks Stephen, Thomas! I've just worked it out, I think! You have to 
change the abdomen 'and' the chest (that's why it looked weird when I first 
tried it). I guess it's the same for other surrounding area's too. I'll try 
some more later.

     ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 07:37:29
Message: <46518479$1@news.povray.org>
BTW, I don't know why I typed Ken - there isn't one is there? Anyway, I 
meant Mike or Don.

    ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 07:51:45
Message: <465187d1$1@news.povray.org>
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46518479$1@news.povray.org...
>
>  BTW, I don't know why I typed Ken - there isn't one is there? Anyway, I 
> meant Mike or Don.
>

You probably were thinking of Barbie  :-)

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 07:56:19
Message: <465188e3$1@news.povray.org>
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message 
news:465187d1$1@news.povray.org...

> You probably were thinking of Barbie  :-)

     Heh, I think I was!  :o)

      ~Steve~


>
> Thomas
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 07:57:43
Message: <46518937$1@news.povray.org>
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:465180b9@news.povray.org...
>
>> It is a matter I am not (yet) familiar with. Later figures than Don have 
>> ecto- endo- or mesomorph features attached to them (although I have not 
>> yet managed to make them work).
>
Got that to work and generated a plump/fat guy :-)  The advantage is that 
the whole figure is morphed (Poser 6 and later).

>
>  Apparently, it was easier with Fractal Design Poser: 
> http://www.algonet.se/~dip/poser1.html
>
Was this the original Poser, back in 1996?


>> Not much of an answer, I am afraid....
>
>   No worries, I always appreciate your help.

<grin> you're welcome!

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 08:00:01
Message: <web.465188633b48260fc4e49fa40@news.povray.org>
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> BTW, I don't know why I typed Ken - there isn't one is there? Anyway, I
> meant Mike or Don.
>


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 09:26:33
Message: <46519e09$1@news.povray.org>
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote in message 
news:web.465188633b48260fc4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>> BTW, I don't know why I typed Ken - there isn't one is there? Anyway, I
>> meant Mike or Don.
>>
> Ken and Barbie? You're getting your dollies mixed up :-)

   LOL!  :o)

   ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 21 May 2007 09:26:34
Message: <46519e0a@news.povray.org>
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote in message 
news:46518937$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:465180b9@news.povray.org...
>>
>>> It is a matter I am not (yet) familiar with. Later figures than Don have 
>>> ecto- endo- or mesomorph features attached to them (although I have not 
>>> yet managed to make them work).
>>
> Got that to work and generated a plump/fat guy :-)  The advantage is that 
> the whole figure is morphed (Poser 6 and later).

    Ah, I see. Hmm, that's better than P5, but I should still be able to do 
it if I work on it carefully. Hmm, no, just tried it, you can't set the 
variables above 2, which works for the abdomen and chest ok, but doesn't for 
the hip area, (even though you can set it to 2), so it still looks 
funny/weird. It might be better once I get some clothes on him.  ;)


>
>>
>>  Apparently, it was easier with Fractal Design Poser: 
>> http://www.algonet.se/~dip/poser1.html
>>
> Was this the original Poser, back in 1996?

     Yes, I think it was. It looks quite good on that page, and I tried to 
find it hidden in the depths of the 'net, but it ain't there...  :o/

>
>
>>> Not much of an answer, I am afraid....
>>
>>   No worries, I always appreciate your help.
>
> <grin> you're welcome!

     And so are you Thomas!   :o)

     ~Steve~


>
> Thomas
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 22 May 2007 03:27:56
Message: <46529b7c@news.povray.org>
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> schreef in bericht news:46519e0a@news.povray.org...
>
>    Ah, I see. Hmm, that's better than P5, but I should still be able to do 
> it if I work on it carefully. Hmm, no, just tried it, you can't set the 
> variables above 2, which works for the abdomen and chest ok, but doesn't 
> for the hip area, (even though you can set it to 2), so it still looks 
> funny/weird. It might be better once I get some clothes on him.  ;)
>
>
Hmm... Now that you have started that line of thought, I feel that I have to 
investigate more in depth... :-)

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: fls13
Subject: Re: Plump Ken
Date: 23 May 2007 19:00:01
Message: <web.4654c6973b48260fd8f382370@news.povray.org>
http://www.antonkisieldesigns.com/~akfiles/htmlpages/ApolloMaximusFree3dhumanfigure.htm

I think you'll find this freebie figure quite excellent on the body morphs.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 4 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.