|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After trying out the learning edition it looks like a very good modeller
indeed! It's as focused on sub-d modelling, as Wings is on box
modelling, but supports the generation of single lines and polys also.
Economy of design is the overriding impression. There is a small,
best-of-breed, mix of tools. The user interface also includes a simple
blend of desirable features from famous highend products. In addition,
the interface is completely customizable.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I bought it a few weeks ago I find it fast smooth and flexible and the plans
for future development look very exciting.
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> I bought it a few weeks ago I find it fast smooth and flexible and the plans
> for future development look very exciting.
It seems quite forward looking and does seem to reflect a best of breed
design mentality. Using Wings has got me used to being able to orient
mayself in space without the need of manipulators and I personally find
them clunky now but traditionally they are considered a highend feature.
And I believe I saw that they can be turned off in Silo anyway. I
never quite got the hang of how to leverage the subdivision modelling
technique to greater advantage for myself but as you say it is the
technique of the future seemingly. I cannot rationalize spending even
dollar one on software right now, not even badly needed maintenance
tools, or I'd be giving Silo a go for sure. Wings is coming along too
though. I now model with quite poerful tools and techniques quite
different from when those I depended on when I first started with it.
But I just spent all day today with the thing crashing every two
minutes, and this is a supposedly stable version!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:40a19fed$1@news.povray.org...
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> > I bought it a few weeks ago I find it fast smooth and flexible and the
plans
> > for future development look very exciting.
>
> It seems quite forward looking and does seem to reflect a best of breed
> design mentality. Using Wings has got me used to being able to orient
> mayself in space without the need of manipulators and I personally find
> them clunky now but traditionally they are considered a highend feature.
You can use the tweak mode by pressing cntrl and moving the selected object
> I never quite got the hang of how to leverage the subdivision modelling
> technique to greater advantage for myself but as you say it is the
> technique of the future seemingly. I cannot rationalize spending even
> dollar one on software right now, not even badly needed maintenance
> tools, or I'd be giving Silo a go for sure. Wings is coming along too
> though. I now model with quite poerful tools and techniques quite
> different from when those I depended on when I first started with it.
> But I just spent all day today with the thing crashing every two
> minutes, and this is a supposedly stable version!
The latest versions of Silo are very stable on my system and has so many
features I've given up on wings!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Where does one find Silo?
How much is it?
== John ==
> The latest versions of Silo are very stable on my system and has so many
> features I've given up on wings!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> The latest versions of Silo are very stable on my system and has so many
> features I've given up on wings!
>
>
In fairness to Wings the crashes were related to something else. There
were mysterious slowdowns also. Though I never found a virus or other,
a reinstall of Windows helped. My drives were also badly fragged. And
the warm weather is playing the devil with my system's poor ability to
tolerate heat.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John D. Gwinner wrote:
> Where does one find Silo?
>
> How much is it?
>
http://www.nevercenter.com/
~$100
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
thanks for the url!
price is reasonable imho
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |