<"acasta" <acastagnini AT yahoo DOT com>> wrote:
> Official povWin binary: about 30''> MinGW binary (GUI): 90''> MinGW binary (console, tried different optimisation options): 80''> Cygwin binary: 47''
Thats strange. I thought Cygwin is basically the same as MingW,
just with additional utilities (like bash for win32 etc) and
libraries for emuluting a unix environment.
Lutz-Peter
ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:
> Have you tried to apply the same compiler options from Cygwin build into flags> in makefile dedicated to MinGW build ? That would be worth to compare.>> ABX
Yes: unfortunately there was no appreciable change in rendering time: I
obtained the usual 80'' for my sample scene I also had with the other MinGW
builds.
The full list of options used in the Cygwin build were:
-O3 -msse -mfpmath=sse -march=pentium3 -mcpu=pentium3
-malign-double -minline-all-stringops
acasta
From: Nicolas Calimet
Subject: Re: Compilation options for MinGW
Date: 31 Jul 2004 12:58:55
Message: <410bcfcf$1@news.povray.org>
> I've compiled the unix/linux source distribution with the Cygwin environment> and results have been quite different.
You may also give a try to: configure --without-cygwin-dll to compile
the unix sources on cygwin but using the mingw32 library instead of the cygwin
DLL.
> By the way, what compiler is used for the official linux binary?
gcc-3.4.0
- NC