POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.programming : Radiance HDR and the GAMMA header field Server Time
21 Dec 2024 09:21:48 EST (-0500)
  Radiance HDR and the GAMMA header field (Message 1 to 3 of 3)  
From: clipka
Subject: Radiance HDR and the GAMMA header field
Date: 10 Sep 2009 11:57:40
Message: <4aa921f4$1@news.povray.org>
Does anyone know *any* software that either reads or writes a GAMMA 
field in the Radiance HDR file header (I mean, except for POV-Ray 3.7 
betas), or even happens to know how to properly interpret the field?


Post a reply to this message

From: Ive
Subject: Re: Radiance HDR and the GAMMA header field
Date: 10 Sep 2009 13:05:37
Message: <4aa931e1$1@news.povray.org>
clipka wrote:
> Does anyone know *any* software that either reads or writes a GAMMA 
> field in the Radiance HDR file header (I mean, except for POV-Ray 3.7 
> betas), or even happens to know how to properly interpret the field?

There is no such thing like a GAMMA field in the Radiance HDR file 
header therefor any other software correctly assumes that the image data 
is in linear color space.
Anything that follows the #?RADIANCE signature besides the two possible 
strings:
"32-bit_rle_rgbe"
"32-bit_rle_xyze"
and the +X / +Y image size definition is nothing else but a comment and 
as such you can write there whatever you like but cannot expect that 
someone else will make use of it.


-Ive


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Radiance HDR and the GAMMA header field
Date: 10 Sep 2009 16:15:29
Message: <4aa95e61$1@news.povray.org>
Ive schrieb:
> There is no such thing like a GAMMA field in the Radiance HDR file 
> header therefor any other software correctly assumes that the image data 
> is in linear color space.
> Anything that follows the #?RADIANCE signature besides the two possible 
> strings:
> "32-bit_rle_rgbe"
> "32-bit_rle_xyze"
> and the +X / +Y image size definition is nothing else but a comment and 
> as such you can write there whatever you like but cannot expect that 
> someone else will make use of it.

That's what I suspected after googling arund. Interestingly, not even 
POV-Ray 3.7 betas make any use of that field when encountering it in 
input images.

Ah, I guess I did open one or two cans of worms when deciding to try and 
improve the gamma handling of input files...


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.