POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.programming : VectorC + Povray? Server Time
24 Dec 2024 23:21:55 EST (-0500)
  VectorC + Povray? (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: Anders Haglund
Subject: VectorC + Povray?
Date: 16 Nov 2000 05:24:40
Message: <3a13b5e8$1@news.povray.org>
Hi!

Has anyone tried to compile Povray with VectorC? (www.codeplay.com)
Would be nice to see if it could speed things up a litle.

/Anders


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: VectorC + Povray?
Date: 17 Nov 2000 19:40:25
Message: <chrishuff-DC8629.19404317112000@news.povray.org>
In article <3a13b5e8$1@news.povray.org>, "Anders Haglund" 
<sto### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> Has anyone tried to compile Povray with VectorC? (www.codeplay.com)
> Would be nice to see if it could speed things up a litle.

Vector processing features like MMX and 3D-Now only work for integer or 
single precision float values. POV-Ray uses mostly double precision 
floats, and can not benefit very much from these features.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: VectorC + Povray?
Date: 18 Nov 2000 07:59:58
Message: <chrishuff-3593D2.08001718112000@news.povray.org>
I don't see your point...MMX still won't accelerate POV-Ray to any 
noticeable degree, because POV uses double precision floats for most 
things. It does use single precision floats for colors, but most of the 
work is done with doubles.
And since this isn't POV code, I don't see how optimizing it has 
anything to do with optimizing POV...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: VectorC + Povray?
Date: 19 Nov 2000 13:33:06
Message: <slrn91g775.bfj.ron.parker@fwi.com>
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 08:00:17 -0500, Chris Huff wrote:
>I don't see your point...MMX still won't accelerate POV-Ray to any 
>noticeable degree, because POV uses double precision floats for most 
>things. It does use single precision floats for colors, but most of the 
>work is done with doubles.
>And since this isn't POV code, I don't see how optimizing it has 
>anything to do with optimizing POV...

What are you replying to here, Chris?  Did someone cancel the originals?

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: VectorC + Povray?
Date: 19 Nov 2000 14:09:55
Message: <chrishuff-A51F04.14101419112000@news.povray.org>
In article <slr### [at] fwicom>, ron### [at] povrayorg 
wrote:

> What are you replying to here, Chris? 

A message that went into a discussion of optimizing a function for 
copying bit maps. I think it was based on some sample code for writing 
stuff to take advantage of MMX with the VectorC compiler, it used colors 
stored as structs of char variables.


> Did someone cancel the originals?

Apparently so...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.