POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.programming : Multi-Processor Server Time
24 Dec 2024 23:19:24 EST (-0500)
  Multi-Processor (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Wolfgang Manousek
Subject: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 13:27:43
Message: <39a6ac8f$1@news.povray.org>
Are there any efforts in process to make POV take advantage of multiple CPUs
in a box ?

thx
Wolfgang


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 16:26:29
Message: <39a6d675@news.povray.org>
Wolfgang Manousek <wol### [at] to_much_spamcom> wrote:
: Are there any efforts in process to make POV take advantage of multiple CPUs
: in a box ?

  Which system we are talking about?

  Please note that povray is a cross-platform program.

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Wolfgang Manousek
Subject: Re: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 17:15:48
Message: <39a6e204$1@news.povray.org>
good point ... unfortunatly all the threading issues are generally OS
specific.

I was talking about Windows / NT system


"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:39a6d675@news.povray.org...
> Wolfgang Manousek <wol### [at] to_much_spamcom> wrote:
> : Are there any efforts in process to make POV take advantage of multiple
CPUs
> : in a box ?
>
>   Which system we are talking about?
>
>   Please note that povray is a cross-platform program.
>
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 17:46:57
Message: <chrishuff-6D4434.16482525082000@news.povray.org>
In article <39a6ac8f$1@news.povray.org>, "Wolfgang Manousek" 
<wol### [at] to_much_spamcom> wrote:

> Are there any efforts in process to make POV take advantage of 
> multiple CPUs in a box ?

Making a multi-processor POV would not only require figuring out some 
way to implement threads in a platform-independant way, but all of the 
problems with global variables, caches, and other shared data would have 
to be sorted out. Basically, a complete rewrite and redesign is 
necessary.
POV-Ray 4.0, which will be a rewrite in C++, will solve some of these 
problems. While it itself might not be multiprocessor enabled, it will 
be a step in the right direction. This *is* being discussed, but right 
now, the POV Team is concentrating their free time on getting 3.5 
released.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 18:17:37
Message: <39a6f081$1@news.povray.org>
In article <39a6d675@news.povray.org> , Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg>  wrote:

> Wolfgang Manousek <wol### [at] to_much_spamcom> wrote:
> : Are there any efforts in process to make POV take advantage of multiple CPUs
> : in a box ?

Isn't this in your VFAQ?


      Thorsten


____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Multi-Processor
Date: 25 Aug 2000 19:22:41
Message: <39a6ffc1@news.povray.org>
Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
: Isn't this in your VFAQ?

  The VFAQ answers why it is difficult to make a multithreaded povray. It
doesn't tell if there's any project going on doing it (mainly for two
reasons: 1) I don't know any specifics and 2) the info will probably get
outdated in a near future).

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):_;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.