 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Anybody updated the Isosurface Patch to work with Windows version 3.1e?
Thanks.
--
Jim
Check out my web site http://www.kressworks.com/
It'll blow your mind (politically), stimulate your senses (artistically)
and provide scientific insights that boggle the mind!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
not yet, to my knowledge, I am waitiong for a new version, as for some reson
it give me one of those usless error messages when i try to run it on mine,
even when i swap dll files about..
Rick
Jim Kress <jim### [at] softhome net> wrote in message
news:373b087c.0@news.povray.org...
> Anybody updated the Isosurface Patch to work with Windows version 3.1e?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jim
>
> Check out my web site http://www.kressworks.com/
> It'll blow your mind (politically), stimulate your senses (artistically)
> and provide scientific insights that boggle the mind!!
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 13 May 1999 20:31:57 +0100, Rick wrote:
>not yet, to my knowledge, I am waitiong for a new version, as for some reson
>it give me one of those usless error messages when i try to run it on mine,
>even when i swap dll files about..
The main problem is that we don't yet have source for the 3.1e version for
Windows. As soon as it's available, that problem should go away.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 13 May 1999 20:31:57 +0100, "Rick" <kit### [at] dialpipexcom>
wrote:
>not yet, to my knowledge, I am waitiong for a new version, as for some reson
>it give me one of those usless error messages when i try to run it on mine,
>even when i swap dll files about..
Only attempt this if you are a programmer-type or at least
experienced with using hex editors. I'd suggest making copies of both
the Superpatch and UVPov executables before proceeding to tinker with
them. This method worked for me and I can successfully use both
patched versions with POV-Ray for Windows v3.1e.
(originally posted in povray.general)
on 04 May 1999 11:12AM PST "Tim Riley" <tri### [at] itsbldrdocgov> wrote:
>At first, I thought I could live without the editor in either the Superpatch
>version or Nathan Kopp's UV version, but I got tired of having to clear the
>"Incorrect DLL version" error message every time I fired either one up. I
>figured that there was a better way than the batch file method; here it is:
>
>* In your POV directory, create a sub-directory named "bun".
>* Place all files related to Superpatch (the executable, which I re-named
> spengine.exe to eliminate confusion, cmax101.dll, the three i_*.dll files),
> and/or UVPov (the executable).
>* Put an old version of cmedit.dll (from version 3.1d or earlier) in "bun".
>* Using an hex editor (I used UltraEdit) open up each of the executables
> and search for the first instance of the string "bin". It occurs in the
> string "bun\cmedit.dll". In the Superpatch executable, it's located at
> location 0xc4f96, in UVPov it's at 0xbd83e.
>* Change "bin" to "bun" (make sure you're doing this in hex mode).
>
>That's it. Make sure your shortcuts point to the new location of the
>executables. All three versions can now co-exist.
>
> -----------------------------------------
>| Tim Riley |
>| Institute for Telecommunication Science |
>| National Telecommunications and |
>| Information Administration |
>| US Dept. of Commerce |
>| Boulder, Colorado |
>| E-mail:tri### [at] itsbldrdocgov |
>| Per favore spenga le Sue scarpe |
>| davanti abbandonare il nave spaziale. |
> -----------------------------------------
--
Alan
------------------------------------------------------------------
povray.org - official home of the Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer
news.povray.org - where POV-Ray enthusiasts from around the world
- get together to exchange ideas and experiences
------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ron Parker wrote:
> The main problem is that we don't yet have source for the 3.1e version for
> Windows. As soon as it's available, that problem should go away.
Out of curiosity just why is that ? The Pov team is usually very good
about releasing the source code in a timely manner but with this last
release there seems to be an abnornaly long delay in it's arrival.
Is Chris on vacation perhaps ?
--
Ken Tyler
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 1999 13:25:48 -0700, Ken wrote:
>Ron Parker wrote:
>
>> The main problem is that we don't yet have source for the 3.1e version for
>> Windows. As soon as it's available, that problem should go away.
>
> Out of curiosity just why is that ? The Pov team is usually very good
>about releasing the source code in a timely manner but with this last
>release there seems to be an abnornaly long delay in it's arrival.
>Is Chris on vacation perhaps ?
I don't know. Maybe someone should ask Chris; I just haven't bothered
yet. The unfortunate fact is, I still don't have good docs for the 3.1e
superpatch either, so the 3.1e source isn't all I need for a release, but
it's a big part.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
