 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jr" <cre### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> > I'm game. I can download that and we can see about getting something started.
>
> <https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki>
I'm already "up and running" - just need to figure out how you log in to the
system to start doing stuff.
- BW
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'setup.png' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'setup.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ingo" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>
> Just as an example how it works in an other language. In the Nim programming
> language
I should have added one more option as it does what one can do with macro's.
Note there is now no output type specified and thus no return value. 'a' is
modified "in place".
proc dothing(a: var int, b: int) =
a = a + b
var a = 1
let b = 2
dothing(a, b) # or a.dothing(b)
echo a #printed result is sum of and b
ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: William F Pokorny
Subject: Re: Suggest v4.0 read only identifiers. (yuqk R15 v0.6.9.0)
Date: 2 Jul 2024 11:32:25
Message: <66841d89$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/29/24 14:36, William F Pokorny wrote:
>>> Given I'm going to delay to implement a build configuration option for
>>> this feature, do you think some other prefix would be better? ('_r',
>>> 'ro_', 'r_', ?)
>>
>> "democracy" eh ?! </grin>. given those options, 'ro_' would be my
>> choice, as
>> it's "mnemonic".
>>
>
> Yeah, and ro_ fits with my keyword prefix direction too.
Release 15 of the yuqk fork has moved to the ro_ prefix to indicate the
identifier is read-only. The build configure script option to disable
the feature was added and is: --disable-read-only-identifiers
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> > <https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki>
Curious if anyone has the ability and inclination to run this in server mode, or
alternatively if someone knows of a peer-to-peer (P2P) style collaborative
document editing FOSS software that would serve our purpose.
- BW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There is http://chiselapp.com/ that hosts fossils (kind of like github) and you
can control who has access to the data. I used it in the past, worked fine then
and then not and then again. Seems to look ok now.
ingo
"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
>
> > > <https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki>
>
> Curious if anyone has the ability and inclination to run this in server mode
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
