On 6/29/24 14:36, William F Pokorny wrote:
>>> Given I'm going to delay to implement a build configuration option for
>>> this feature, do you think some other prefix would be better? ('_r',
>>> 'ro_', 'r_', ?)
>>
>> "democracy" eh ?! </grin>.  given those options, 'ro_' would be my 
>> choice, as
>> it's "mnemonic".
>>
> 
> Yeah, and ro_ fits with my keyword prefix direction too.

Release 15 of the yuqk fork has moved to the ro_ prefix to indicate the 
identifier is read-only. The build configure script option to disable 
the feature was added and is: --disable-read-only-identifiers

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message