 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
referencing?
0/0 = Freeman
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gordon Freeman's glasses?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kyle <no### [at] spam here> wrote:
> Gordon Freeman's glasses?
No, nothing like that.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/3/2010 8:11 AM, Warp wrote:
> I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> referencing?
>
> 0/0 = Freeman
Dyson Spheres?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge <myu### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> On 11/3/2010 8:11 AM, Warp wrote:
> > I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> > referencing?
> >
> > 0/0 = Freeman
> Dyson Spheres?
No.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> referencing?
>
> 0/0 = Freeman
a free man is a man who can divide 0 by 0?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: iso-8859-1, 10 lines --]
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> > I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> > referencing?
> >
> > 0/0 = Freeman
> a free man is a man who can divide 0 by 0?
No.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge wrote:
> On 11/3/2010 8:11 AM, Warp wrote:
>> I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
>> referencing?
>>
>> 0/0 = Freeman
>
> Dyson Spheres?
Dyson spheres of *brass*, if you're talking Gordon Freeman.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 03/11/2010 16:11, Warp nous fit lire :
> I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> referencing?
>
> 0/0 = Freeman
>
A conway notation of knots.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le_Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Le 03/11/2010 16:11, Warp nous fit lire :
> > I thought of this rather obscure reference. Can you guess what is it
> > referencing?
> >
> > 0/0 = Freeman
> >
> A conway notation of knots.
No. (I don't even understand what that means...)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
