 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
(despite never having gone there ;) ).
http://feeds.theinquirer.net/c/554/f/7127/s/5c7f2a3/l/0L0Stheinquirer0Bnet0Cinquirer0Cnews0C15297410Cnasa0Eisps0Eshame/
story01.htm
....Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://tinyurl.com/mklgzz
Lunar rocks, eh?
BTW, NASA apparently has an image site. What I can't figure out is why
the hell all the images are so blurry and low resolution...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: clipka
Subject: Re: NASA has a 100Mbit connection to the moon
Date: 27 Aug 2009 10:35:29
Message: <4a9699b1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible schrieb:
> BTW, NASA apparently has an image site. What I can't figure out is why
> the hell all the images are so blurry and low resolution...
Possibly because you have so far only disovered /one/ of their many
multimedia-laden sites?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:48:43 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/mklgzz
>
> Lunar rocks, eh?
>
>
> BTW, NASA apparently has an image site. What I can't figure out is why
> the hell all the images are so blurry and low resolution...
The image site I've visited has exceptional images at very high
resolutions....which site are you visiting?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> BTW, NASA apparently has an image site. What I can't figure out is why
>> the hell all the images are so blurry and low resolution...
>
> The image site I've visited has exceptional images at very high
> resolutions....which site are you visiting?
http://www.nasaimages.org/
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:47:28 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> BTW, NASA apparently has an image site. What I can't figure out is why
>>> the hell all the images are so blurry and low resolution...
>>
>> The image site I've visited has exceptional images at very high
>> resolutions....which site are you visiting?
>
> http://www.nasaimages.org/
I dunno, I just pulled up a photo of M81 and it looks pretty good to me -
maybe a bit grainy (but that's to be expected as it's an un-retouched
photo).
I guess it depends on what images you're looking at.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
