Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I'm sure Google had to add a special case in order to find "C++". Or maybe
> it uses the sheer amount of results having it. It would usually ignore that
> punctuation.

I imagine so too. In the early days, you had to search for "dotnet", which I 
think is still out there to a great extent.

And of course you *still* get collisions with all the sites that talk about 
yiddayadda.net.



-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> I'm sure Google had to add a special case in order to find "C++". Or
>> maybe it uses the sheer amount of results having it. It would usually
>> ignore that punctuation.
> 
> I imagine so too. In the early days, you had to search for "dotnet", which
> I think is still out there to a great extent.

In the early days...

"the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
"who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

No results.

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> In the early days...
> 
> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> 
> No results.

Yes.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> In the early days...
>>
>> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>
>> No results.
> 
> Yes.

"yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

John
-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei

Post a reply to this message

Doctor John wrote:

> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...

Post a reply to this message

Invisible wrote:
> Doctor John wrote:
> 
>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> 
> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...

A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
heights of his abilities ;-)

-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei

Post a reply to this message

>>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...
> 
> A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
> heights of his abilities ;-)

I actually have no idea what Yes sounded like. I just like their cover 
art... ;-)

I did, however, see Mr Wakeman live in concert a few weeks ago at 
Hampton Court.

Post a reply to this message

Doctor John wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> In the early days...
>>>
>>> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>>
>>> No results.
>> Yes.
> 
> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

Hey, thanks for picking up on that and hammering it into the greasy spot 
where the dead horse used to be. ;-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!

Post a reply to this message

>>>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...
>>
>> A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
>> heights of his abilities ;-)
> 
> I actually have no idea what Yes sounded like. I just like their cover 
> art... ;-)
> 
> I did, however, see Mr Wakeman live in concert a few weeks ago at 
> Hampton Court.

The *real* reason "why semantic search reeks": This news post, for 
example, has NOTHING TO DO with the stated topic! ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Well, the future goes for semantic, not literal search.

From a Slashdot comment:
Google is old hat - everyone who is anyone uses Wolfram Alpha.
Alpha-ing "cost of keyboard" [1] gives a price of $47.87 - although if it
has a "market cap" (is that anything like caps lock?) the price skyrockets
to $21.2 billion.

Just be glad you're looking at the cost of a keyboard instead of the actual
value [2] - according to Wolfram Alpha, the value of a keyboard is U+2328.
Although I'm not sure what that is in US dollars, because "convert U+2328
to US dollars" [3] doesn't seem to give anything helpful.

[1] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cost+of+keyboard
[2] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=value+of+keyboard
[3] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=convert+U%2B2328+to+US+dollars

Yeah, welcome to the future...

Wait, what?

Post a reply to this message