POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Why semantic search reeks Server Time
5 Sep 2024 23:13:23 EDT (-0400)
  Why semantic search reeks (Message 11 to 20 of 21)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>
From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 27 May 2009 15:05:16
Message: <4a1d8eec@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> gregjohn wrote:
>> I think that this shows why I hate semantic search.
> 
> It's usually more of a problem when the search results you're looking for
> aren't actually indexed.
> 
> And my favorite screw-up was naming it "C# .NET"  Hey MS, could you
> possibly have picked a name for a technology that would be harder to
> search for? Maybe something consisting only of hyphens and spaces?

I'm sure Google had to add a special case in order to find "C++". Or maybe
it uses the sheer amount of results having it. It would usually ignore that
punctuation.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 27 May 2009 16:30:38
Message: <4a1da2ee$1@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I'm sure Google had to add a special case in order to find "C++". Or maybe
> it uses the sheer amount of results having it. It would usually ignore that
> punctuation.

I imagine so too. In the early days, you had to search for "dotnet", which I 
think is still out there to a great extent.

And of course you *still* get collisions with all the sites that talk about 
yiddayadda.net.



-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 28 May 2009 20:10:22
Message: <4a1f27ee@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> I'm sure Google had to add a special case in order to find "C++". Or
>> maybe it uses the sheer amount of results having it. It would usually
>> ignore that punctuation.
> 
> I imagine so too. In the early days, you had to search for "dotnet", which
> I think is still out there to a great extent.

In the early days...

"the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
"who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

No results.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 28 May 2009 20:15:37
Message: <4a1f2929$1@news.povray.org>
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> In the early days...
> 
> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> 
> No results.

Yes.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!


Post a reply to this message

From: Doctor John
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 09:17:25
Message: <4a1fe065$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> In the early days...
>>
>> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>
>> No results.
> 
> Yes.

"yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

John
-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 09:41:08
Message: <4a1fe5f4@news.povray.org>
Doctor John wrote:

> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...


Post a reply to this message

From: Doctor John
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 09:47:06
Message: <4a1fe75a@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> Doctor John wrote:
> 
>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
> 
> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...

A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
heights of his abilities ;-)

-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 10:19:02
Message: <4a1feed6@news.povray.org>
>>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...
> 
> A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
> heights of his abilities ;-)

I actually have no idea what Yes sounded like. I just like their cover 
art... ;-)

I did, however, see Mr Wakeman live in concert a few weeks ago at 
Hampton Court.


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 12:24:06
Message: <4a200c26@news.povray.org>
Doctor John wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> In the early days...
>>>
>>> "the" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>> "who" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>>
>>> No results.
>> Yes.
> 
> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query

Hey, thanks for picking up on that and hammering it into the greasy spot 
where the dead horse used to be. ;-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Why semantic search reeks
Date: 29 May 2009 13:07:35
Message: <4a201657$1@news.povray.org>
>>>> "yes" is a common word so it was ignored from your query
>>> Good luck finding that band that used to have Wakeman in it...
>>
>> A keyboard player 'par excellence'. I assume you are aspiring to the
>> heights of his abilities ;-)
> 
> I actually have no idea what Yes sounded like. I just like their cover 
> art... ;-)
> 
> I did, however, see Mr Wakeman live in concert a few weeks ago at 
> Hampton Court.

The *real* reason "why semantic search reeks": This news post, for 
example, has NOTHING TO DO with the stated topic! ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 1 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.