|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> > You forgot hydrogen and methane.
> I thought H2 is quite rare in air?
The same source which produces methane also produces significant amounts
of hydrogen.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> PS. Apparently there *are* compounds of Argon and gold, would you believe...
Yes, I believe! (don't want to build a sect)
> I thought H2 is quite rare in air?
I hope you, if not, it could be dangerous. Ey, but we could solve all energy
problems, we have. ^^
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> liquid, nozzle. Would you prefer faffing about with two-skin cans or
All you'd need to do is run a can-length straw down the inside from the
nozzle, like they do when you actually *want* to spray the liquid in the
can (like WD-40, say).
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
It's not feature creep if you put it
at the end and adjust the release date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
bluetree wrote:
> BTW, you were talking about "smelling" fish
I was always amused that fish is one of those rare foods that people
dislike when it tastes like what it is.
"How was the dinner?"
"Ick. Too fishy."
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
It's not feature creep if you put it
at the end and adjust the release date.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
gregjohn wrote:
> My son has an elementary school homework assignment where he's supposed to do
> simple observations on a solid, liquid, and gas for seven days. Solids: easy,
> liquids: seven is probably exact the number that is easy to name. Gases? So
> far, we've done air, boiling water, and the smoke from cooking fish. But
> that's about all I can think of without either getting dangerous or overly
> egg-headed.
Nitrogen, Oxygen, Water Vapor, Carbon Dioxide,
Possibly: Propane, Butane, Methane (If you have a lighter, butane,
natural gas: methane, gas grill: propane)
In small amounts: Neon (little orange lamps seen on some electrical
equipment), maybe Argon (some light bulbs)...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Isn't there a rare gas that seeps into the basements of houses in Cornwell and
> similar areas that is toxic?
Radon ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> I was always amused that fish is one of those rare foods that people
> dislike when it tastes like what it is.
>
> "How was the dinner?"
> "Ick. Too fishy."
^^ yeah.
But people are every time very disgusted, if things are tasting like chicken
(and there is no chicken inside the food).
don't know why
Chicken is good, isn't it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Quick: name seven gases in your house!
Date: 11 Jan 2008 15:43:54
Message: <4787d50a@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
gregjohn wrote:
> My son has an elementary school homework assignment where he's supposed to do
> simple observations on a solid, liquid, and gas for seven days. Solids: easy,
> liquids: seven is probably exact the number that is easy to name. Gases? So
> far, we've done air, boiling water, and the smoke from cooking fish. But
> that's about all I can think of without either getting dangerous or overly
> egg-headed.
>
Oxygen
Nitrogen
Argon
Carbon dioxide (burn something)
Water vapor (normally present when humidity is above zero)
Methane (when people pass gas)
Hydrogen sulfide (ditto)
Hope this helps,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:24:06 +0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> I think the fact it doesn't 'do anything' from our limited perception on
>>> matters makes it seem rarer, a bit like the fact that nitrogen forms a
>>> greater percentage of air then oxygen sometimes comes as a shock to people.
>>
>> Isn't there a rare gas that seeps into the basements of houses in Cornwell and
>> similar areas that is toxic?
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon
>
>Radioactive, not toxic. (It's a noble gas, after all...)
Are you correcting my English?
>PS. Apparently there *are* compounds of Argon and gold, would you believe...
Aye!
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:30:35 -0600, Mike Raiford <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Isn't there a rare gas that seeps into the basements of houses in Cornwell and
>> similar areas that is toxic?
>
>Radon ...
Thanks!
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |