![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:29:03 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>
>>>> Makes you
>>>> wonder what on Earth you can actually do with a 4KB machine...
>>> Not for those who actually have used 4 KB machines. ;-)
>> Alternatively, "makes you wonder what the **** is using up 4,096 bytes
>> for an *empty* email?!"
>
> Easy: Headers.
Index entries, too. And maybe it's counting clusters allocated.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:47:19 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:29:03 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>>>> Makes you
>>>>> wonder what on Earth you can actually do with a 4KB machine...
>>>> Not for those who actually have used 4 KB machines. ;-)
>>> Alternatively, "makes you wonder what the **** is using up 4,096 bytes
>>> for an *empty* email?!"
>>
>> Easy: Headers.
>
> Index entries, too. And maybe it's counting clusters allocated.
True
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 07/10/2010 05:47 PM, Darren New wrote:
> And maybe it's counting clusters allocated.
I don't think so. It only tells you the email size to the nearest whole
number, but I've seen emails listed as 1KB. (Then again, I don't know
what the cluster size is...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |