![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> And then of course there's equal-tempered vs. pythagorean vs.
> what-have-you tuning, just to make matters more fun (and I didn't even
> mention "blue notes") ;-)
Nobody seriously uses tunings other than equal-tempered. (And, FWIW,
I've tried it, and the difference seems extremely slight.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 01.08.2010 18:18, schrieb Orchid XP v8:
>> And then of course there's equal-tempered vs. pythagorean vs.
>> what-have-you tuning, just to make matters more fun (and I didn't even
>> mention "blue notes") ;-)
>
> Nobody seriously uses tunings other than equal-tempered. (And, FWIW,
> I've tried it, and the difference seems extremely slight.)
Don't church organs typically still use some older-fashioned tuning?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Nobody seriously uses tunings other than equal-tempered. (And, FWIW,
>> I've tried it, and the difference seems extremely slight.)
>
> Don't church organs typically still use some older-fashioned tuning?
I guess that would depend on how old they are? ;-)
Some of them are tuned to a reference pitch other than A4 = 440 Hz,
though. I'll tell you that for free...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |