 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnyFYs7x1zM
1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
2. She has a very nice bottom. I'm loving that skirt too. Damn, pity
there aren't any people like that in *my* dance class!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnyFYs7x1zM
> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
Better than this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>
> Better than this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
Uh... why yes, yes it is. o_O
Perhaps the most worrying part is how into it everybody looks. (!)
Clearly I need to find some video of my school dancing. Then you will
know what actual dancing looks like. ;-)
(Incidentally, there *is* in fact a Rock & Roll move known as The
Chicken Walk. What you do is you... walk... like... a chicken.
Essentially, anyway.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:38:14 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnyFYs7x1zM
>
>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>
> Better than this:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
They're both better than this guy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHn1n0JJiFc
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> 2. She has a very nice bottom. I'm loving that skirt too. Damn, pity
> there aren't any people like that in *my* dance class!
What are the people like in your class? :-O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>> 2. She has a very nice bottom. I'm loving that skirt too. Damn, pity
>> there aren't any people like that in *my* dance class!
>
> What are the people like in your class? :-O
Which one? I'm in *several* classes. ;-)
I'm not very good with ages, but I'd say that most of the people in my
classes are in their 40s or older. (With several notable exceptions.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I'm not very good with ages, but I'd say that most of the people in my
> classes are in their 40s or older. (With several notable exceptions.)
It's not like people in their 40's cannot have good... assets.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> It's not like people in their 40's cannot have good... assets.
Well put! ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> 1. That's some pretty poor dancing.
>> Better than this:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UV3kRV46Zs
>
> They're both better than this guy:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHn1n0JJiFc
Actually... I didn't think he was *that* bad. At least he put commitment
into it. I've seen people dance propper dance steps and not make it look
that convincing. There's a lot to be said for energy and enthusiasm.
If you want to see *bad* dancing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umEShQ2SXK8
This is the first search result for "John Sargent". His name has become
synonymous with abysmal dancing. Dancing *so bad* that people were
actually voting to keep him in the competition _because_ he's so bad
it's amusing.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:07:05 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Actually... I didn't think he was *that* bad. At least he put commitment
> into it. I've seen people dance propper dance steps and not make it look
> that convincing. There's a lot to be said for energy and enthusiasm.
There's also a lot to be said for throwing yourself into it. And for
being concussed. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
