Newsflash: Updating a moderately complicated data structure with lots of 
redundancy is quite tricky. :-/

Post a reply to this message

Pro-tip: If your code contains half a dozen complicated special cases of 
the same general pattern, go abstract that pattern properly. It's much 
easier. ;-)

Post a reply to this message

On 15-6-2010 13:22, Invisible wrote:
> Pro-tip: If your code contains half a dozen complicated special cases of 
> the same general pattern, go abstract that pattern properly. It's much 
> easier. ;-)

your own ode?

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:

> your own code?

Yeah.

Of course, the hardest part is wrapping your brain around what the 
computer needs to do, rather than how to make it do it...

Post a reply to this message

andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 15-6-2010 13:22, Invisible wrote:
> > Pro-tip: If your code contains half a dozen complicated special cases of
> > the same general pattern, go abstract that pattern properly. It's much
> > easier. ;-)
>
> your own ode?

an ode to Andrew?  he's been self-oded! :P

Post a reply to this message

On 15-6-2010 18:03, nemesis wrote:
> andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> On 15-6-2010 13:22, Invisible wrote:
>>> Pro-tip: If your code contains half a dozen complicated special cases of
>>> the same general pattern, go abstract that pattern properly. It's much
>>> easier. ;-)
>> your own ode?
> 
> an ode to Andrew?  he's been self-oded! :P
> 

Hmm, I didn't notice that. I did spill some tea on my keyboard a few 
days ago (that is probably why I normally don't drink tea). Yet, even 
this message proves that that key is functioning. Probably a braino than.

Post a reply to this message