The retention settings don't seem to work in this group or in p.b.i
(hence why I am posting again). Are they overridden somehow by the server?
--
http://isometricland.com
From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Thunderbird (again)
Date: 4 Jun 2010 18:07:14
Message: <4c097912$1@news.povray.org>
SharkD wrote:
> The retention settings don't seem to work in this group or in p.b.i > (hence why I am posting again). Are they overridden somehow by the server?
I have o-t posts all the way back to the beginning of the year.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Eiffel - The language that lets you specify exactly
that the code does what you think it does, even if
it doesn't do what you wanted.
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Thunderbird (again)
Date: 4 Jun 2010 18:20:49
Message: <4c097c41$1@news.povray.org>
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:23:26 -0400, SharkD wrote:
> The retention settings don't seem to work in this group or in p.b.i> (hence why I am posting again). Are they overridden somehow by the> server?
Nope. An NNTP server has no control over what articles are retained by
the client - not part of the protocol.
Jim
On 6/4/2010 4:23 PM, SharkD wrote:
> The retention settings don't seem to work in this group or in p.b.i> (hence why I am posting again). Are they overridden somehow by the server?>>
Doh! I had the thread set to "Threads with Unread". I wish this option
would show up in the right-click menu...
--
http://isometricland.com
