 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
You may note that I *started* this thread. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:16:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>> And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
>>
>>
> Ah! Well. It just goes to show…
>
> But after falling into a black hole and travelling halfway round the
> known universe then two and a half times round the multiverse, being
> turned inside out and back to front. Only to find I’m back where I
> started. You grudge me taking the shortest route?
I want to see an audit of the moves you made on that route. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/06/2010 6:39 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 23:16:19 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
>>>
>>>
>> Ah! Well. It just goes to show…
>>
>> But after falling into a black hole and travelling halfway round the
>> known universe then two and a half times round the multiverse, being
>> turned inside out and back to front. Only to find I’m back where I
>> started. You grudge me taking the shortest route?
>
> I want to see an audit of the moves you made on that route. ;-)
>
Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes
is enough. Brrrr!
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>
>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>
> You may note that I *started* this thread. ;-)
>
You self highjacker, you. :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes
> is enough. Brrrr!
Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of
reference. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:28:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>>
>> You may note that I *started* this thread. ;-)
>>
>>
> You self highjacker, you. :-)
I do that quite frequently. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/06/2010 8:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several lifetimes
>> is enough. Brrrr!
>
> Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of
> reference. ;-)
>
I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
the event horizon.
So believe it or not.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/06/2010 8:20 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:28:22 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12/06/2010 6:38 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:20:51 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>>
>>>> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>>>
>>> You may note that I *started* this thread. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> You self highjacker, you. :-)
>
> I do that quite frequently. ;-)
>
:-D
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:32:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 8:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:26:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Go ahead but don't expect me to live it again. Once in several
>>> lifetimes is enough. Brrrr!
>>
>> Oh, you don't have to live it again, just provide the points of
>> reference. ;-)
>>
>>
> I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
> the event horizon.
I guess we'll have to start work on stripping the event horizon so we can
see how it was done. ;-)
> So believe it or not.
Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/06/2010 5:35 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:32:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I don’t have the mathematics for it and I lost causality when crossing
>> the event horizon.
>
> I guess we'll have to start work on stripping the event horizon so we can
> see how it was done. ;-)
>
What do you mean *we*, Mathematician. ;-)
>> So believe it or not.
>
> Fenchurch Street Station, then. ;-)
>
Mornington Crescent
I also orbited a strange attractor :-P
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
