|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along with
>> other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php
>
> Yeah, that's where I found Navy Lark. :-)
>
And you didn't tell me about it. HUMPH!
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:14:39 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:34:08 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>> You are wrong!
>>>>
>>>> Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't.
>>>> ;-)
>>>>
>>> But you are
>>> :-P
>>
>> No, I'm not, I'm arguing about whether or not I'm arguing about it.
>> Biiiig difference. ;-)
>>
>>
> Well I’m arguing whether or not you’re just arguing and you are. :-)
No, you were arguing about whether I was arguing about it being a
tautology, and I'm not arguing that. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:16:02 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along
>>> with other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php
>>
>> Yeah, that's where I found Navy Lark. :-)
>>
>>
> And you didn't tell me about it. HUMPH!
I thought you knew about it! ;-)
And what does Humph have to do with it?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/06/2010 11:21 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:14:39 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:34:08 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> You are wrong!
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, yes, you're wrong, I *could* and *can* argue that, but I won't.
>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> But you are
>>>> :-P
>>>
>>> No, I'm not, I'm arguing about whether or not I'm arguing about it.
>>> Biiiig difference. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Well I’m arguing whether or not you’re just arguing and you are. :-)
>
> No, you were arguing about whether I was arguing about it being a
> tautology, and I'm not arguing that. ;-)
>
Flipping Eck! you're right. See that good night's sleep worked wonders. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:51:32 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>> Well I’m arguing whether or not you’re just arguing and you are. :-)
>>
>> No, you were arguing about whether I was arguing about it being a
>> tautology, and I'm not arguing that. ;-)
>>
>>
> Flipping Eck! you're right. See that good night's sleep worked wonders.
> ;-)
Pity I didn't get a good night's sleep - still didn't get to sleep until
after 1, and was up about 6 hours later (had to prepare for participation
in two group interviews this morning). :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/04/10 13:16, andrel wrote:
> Comming back from a conference and subsequent stay in a monastery in
> Greece only to find a discussion on firefighters intelligence and UK vs
> US intelligence.
> Lets combine these two: any test that shows US persons are on average
> more intelligent than UK ones is inherently racist.
Well, no. It would be nationalistic.
--
Guitar for sale. Very cheap. No strings attached.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 05/06/2010 12:40 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:51:32 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>> Well I’m arguing whether or not you’re just arguing and you are. :-)
>>>
>>> No, you were arguing about whether I was arguing about it being a
>>> tautology, and I'm not arguing that. ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Flipping Eck! you're right. See that good night's sleep worked wonders.
>> ;-)
>
> Pity I didn't get a good night's sleep - still didn't get to sleep until
> after 1, and was up about 6 hours later (had to prepare for participation
> in two group interviews this morning). :-)
>
No wonder you were grumpy and argumentative. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/06/2010 11:21 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 23:16:02 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 04/06/2010 10:45 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:36:56 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’ve just found a site that has some ISIHAC CD’s for download along
>>>> with other interesting things. http://radioarchive.cc/index.php
>>>
>>> Yeah, that's where I found Navy Lark. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> And you didn't tell me about it. HUMPH!
>
> I thought you knew about it! ;-)
>
No, I got my Navy Lark from the Goons Show Depository (long gone for
downloads :-( )
> And what does Humph have to do with it?
>
Not a lot now. :-(
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:52:16 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>> Pity I didn't get a good night's sleep - still didn't get to sleep
>> until after 1, and was up about 6 hours later (had to prepare for
>> participation in two group interviews this morning). :-)
>>
>>
> No wonder you were grumpy and argumentative. ;-)
I wasn't! ;-)
(Been playing with my new router tonight, damn, is it *really* 4:40 AM?)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:56:24 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>> I thought you knew about it! ;-)
>>
>>
> No, I got my Navy Lark from the Goons Show Depository (long gone for
> downloads :-( )
Yeah, I had seen that site - there's still the seagoon server in Japan,
but it's not set up for someone to suck all episodes, but good for
filling in missing eps.
>> And what does Humph have to do with it?
>>
>>
> Not a lot now. :-(
Sadly true. New series comes out soon, doesn't it?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |