 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Haha... Ohh boy.
The reality of the situation sinks in. ;-)
> Maybe now I'll have something to post to my blog. Yeah,
> I'll share pictures when I get to building it.
>
> I'm still in the design phase. Maybe this evening I'll print up some
> screen captures of the layout in the sim.
I got as far as buying about 20x 7400s before I realised I couldn't make
them do anything.
Good luck. 0;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yes, the GPO.
>
> pardon my ignorance, but what is a GPO?
What, couldn't Google it? >;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Post_Office
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Back when I used to watch TV, nobody had Internet access yet. To find
> out if there was anything on, you switch the TV through all 6 channels
> and see if you see anything good.
Did you have to wait several minutes for the tubes to warm up? Turn on the
TV five minutes before the hour or risk missing the opening minutes of the show?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Ada - the programming language trying to avoid
you literally shooting yourself in the foot.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Back when I used to watch TV, nobody had Internet access yet. To find
>> out if there was anything on, you switch the TV through all 6 channels
>> and see if you see anything good.
>
> Did you have to wait several minutes for the tubes to warm up?
No. I'm not *that* old. :-P
Although, come to think of it... when you turn the TV off, it makes a
weird crackling noise, and the whole screen is now covered in static. I
never did understand why. Modern CRTs don't seem to do that...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 2010 09:06:29 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> Yes, obviously it hadn't occurred to me that these days the data is
>>> probably online.
>>
>> Indeed, there are quite a few things online that answer the sorts of
>> questions you're prone to asking. ;-)
>
> Back when I used to watch TV, nobody had Internet access yet. To find
> out if there was anything on, you switch the TV through all 6 channels
> and see if you see anything good. It hadn't occurred to me that times
> have changed since then.
So now you know. ;-)
>>>>> I think meeting Mr Fry might possibly be almost as interesting as
>>>>> meeting Einstein. ;-)
>>>> I'm quite sure he'd be more interesting. :-)
>>> I'm not so sure... but neither claim is falsifiable, so...
>>
>> It depends on the person. Did you know that Stephen Fry writes about
>> open source software?
>
> I imagine Mr Fry writes about quite a few things.
He sure does, quite the "Renaissance Man".
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 2010 09:08:47 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> In a recent interview, Mario Batali was quoted as saying:
>>
>> "On any level to watch someone else do something they're good at is
>> entertaining, whether it's playing violin, cooking or playing
>> baseball."
>>
>> (This in the context of watching cooking shows). I think it could
>> apply here as well.
>
> Well, I don't know. Watching somebody staring at a piece of paper and
> thinking really hard doesn't sound entertaining to me, but then again I
> haven't tried it with somebody who's really awesome at thinking...
When you get to the level of a Hawking or similar, it's not necessarily
staring at a piece of paper, it's working through things on the
whiteboard. That can be fun to watch - people at that level tend to
think out loud.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/12/2010 7:56 AM, Invisible wrote:
> I got as far as buying about 20x 7400s before I realised I couldn't make
> them do anything.
>
> Good luck. 0;-)
Hehe ... I've actually got the gates to do things. Not very interesting
things, but things. Its nice when you get the expected result.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5/12/2010 7:57 AM, Invisible wrote:
>>> Yes, the GPO.
>>
>> pardon my ignorance, but what is a GPO?
>
> What, couldn't Google it? >;-)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Post_Office
I saw that, but I didn't think it had any relevance to the conversation.
You mean to tell me the post office controls the phone system?
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/05/2010 8:25 PM, Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 5/12/2010 7:57 AM, Invisible wrote:
>>>> Yes, the GPO.
>>>
>>> pardon my ignorance, but what is a GPO?
>>
>> What, couldn't Google it? >;-)
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Post_Office
>
> I saw that, but I didn't think it had any relevance to the conversation.
> You mean to tell me the post office controls the phone system?
>
In the good old days :-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Hehe ... I've actually got the gates to do things. Not very interesting
> things, but things. Its nice when you get the expected result.
Yeah, well, I wouldn't know. :-/
Have fun. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
