 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
After seeing the promotional materials for this film by Disney, I think
it should have been named _Acid in Wonderland_.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmail com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4baab29a$1@news.povray.org...
> After seeing the promotional materials for this film by Disney, I think it
> should have been named _Acid in Wonderland_.
Did you see the caterpillar in the original Disney movie? I don't know what
this creature smoked ;-)
I'm looking forward to seeing the DVD - I never go to the movies.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: 4baab29a$1@news.povray.org...
> After seeing the promotional materials for this film by Disney, I think it
> should have been named _Acid in Wonderland_.
>
Disney ok but Tim Burton director :)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:01:59 +0100, M_a_r_c wrote:
> "John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> a écrit dans le message
> de news: 4baab29a$1@news.povray.org...
>> After seeing the promotional materials for this film by Disney, I think
>> it should have been named _Acid in Wonderland_.
>>
> Disney ok but Tim Burton director :)
>
> Marc
See, I'd have turned that around - Tim Burton ok (actually better than
that), but Disney???? ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> See, I'd have turned that around - Tim Burton ok (actually better than
> that), but Disney???? ;-)
What do you mean by that? (Honest question of a non-native English speaking
individual ;-)
There are at least two version of "Alice" by Disney - the animated movie of
1951 and the new one, soon to be released, directed by Tim Burton (produced
by Disney). The old animated movie I saw on TV when I was a kid. Nice. The
new one - well we'll see...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4babc93e@news.povray.org...
>> Disney ok but Tim Burton director :)
>>
>> Marc
>
> See, I'd have turned that around - Tim Burton ok (actually better than
> that), but Disney???? ;-)
>
> Jim
Well I meant "Disney is just ok but see... Tim Burton is the director!" :)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:15 +0100, M_a_r_c wrote:
> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 4babc93e@news.povray.org...
>>> Disney ok but Tim Burton director :)
>>>
>>> Marc
>>
>> See, I'd have turned that around - Tim Burton ok (actually better than
>> that), but Disney???? ;-)
>>
>> Jim
> Well I meant "Disney is just ok but see... Tim Burton is the director!"
> :)
>
> Marc
OIC. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:49:23 +0100, TC wrote:
>> See, I'd have turned that around - Tim Burton ok (actually better than
>> that), but Disney???? ;-)
>
> What do you mean by that? (Honest question of a non-native English
> speaking individual ;-)
Disney is known for "family friendly" films; Tim Burton is known for
making fairly dark films. The two don't exactly go together. :-)
Though Disney is a large enough brand that they do have a wide variety of
films, the "traditional" films that they're well known for are mostly "G"
rated.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TC" <do-not-reply@i-do get-enough-spam-already-2498.com> wrote:
> I'm looking forward to seeing the DVD - I never go to the movies.
But it's in glorious 'new' 3-D!!! ;-p Well, 3-D 'after the fact', AFAIK. Made
as a regular 2-D film? Haven't seen it yet, but I'm curious to know how that
post-processing step(?) turned out.
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
