http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_and_the_legal_system

"It is abundantly clear that plaintiffs sought to harass the individual 
defendants and destroy the church defendants through massive 
over-litigation and other highly questionable litigation tactics. The 
Special Master has never seen a more glaring example of bad faith 
litigation than this."

Bad faith? Now that's amusing... ;-)

Post a reply to this message

"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message 
news:4ba23e7c$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Bad faith? Now that's amusing... ;-)

Very amusing... thank the Good Lord and seven of her extraterrestrial 
minions that all that money and time isn't being wasted on any frivolous 
pursuits. I'd hate to think what a mess the world would be in if vitally 
important issues like this weren't being addressed in the hallowed halls of 
the justice system.

--
Jack

Post a reply to this message

And lo On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:53:46 -0000, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did  
spake thusly:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_and_the_legal_system
>
> "It is abundantly clear that plaintiffs sought to harass the individual  
> defendants and destroy the church defendants through massive  
> over-litigation and other highly questionable litigation tactics. The  
> Special Master has never seen a more glaring example of bad faith  
> litigation than this."
>
> Bad faith? Now that's amusing... ;-)

Difficult to get my head around a religion with intellectual property;  
"and Jesus® said unto his Disciples® 'Take this and eat it for it is my  
body.'®"

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

Phil Cook v2 wrote:

> Difficult to get my head around a religion with intellectual property; 
> "and Jesus® said unto his Disciples® 'Take this and eat it for it is my 
> body.'®"

Ah, it's good to have Phil Cook v2 back, isn't it guys? :-)

Or should that be Phil Cook v2®?

Post a reply to this message