POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : More failure Server Time
4 Sep 2024 21:21:24 EDT (-0400)
  More failure (Message 41 to 50 of 59)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 9 Messages >>>
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: More failure
Date: 25 Feb 2010 14:09:08
Message: <4b86cad4$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>>> HAL wasn't evil.  Just overenthusiastic.
>> Thus spake Zaraprogrammer :-)
> 
> It's explained quite well in the book, really. :)  No more evil than a 
> general sending soldiers on a mission where he knows they'll die. Not 
> *good* mind you...
> 

Yes, how can a machine be evil?

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: More failure
Date: 25 Feb 2010 14:30:33
Message: <4b86cfd9@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mca### [at] aoldotcom> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > Stephen wrote:
> >>> HAL wasn't evil.  Just overenthusiastic.
> >> Thus spake Zaraprogrammer :-)
> > 
> > It's explained quite well in the book, really. :)  No more evil than a 
> > general sending soldiers on a mission where he knows they'll die. Not 
> > *good* mind you...
> > 

> Yes, how can a machine be evil?

  Many scifi books explore the idea that machines are not good or evil,
but completely neutral. Their problem is that they are too logical, and
when given contradictory directives, they will try to come up with a solution
which fulfills all of them at the same time. IIRC that was the case with
2001: A Space Odyssey as well as many books by Asimov (and one of the ideas
behind the so-called "zeroth law of robotics" in his books).

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: More failure
Date: 25 Feb 2010 15:38:24
Message: <4b86dfc0$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>   Many scifi books explore the idea that machines are not good or evil,
> but completely neutral. Their problem is that they are too logical, and
> when given contradictory directives, they will try to come up with a solution
> which fulfills all of them at the same time. IIRC that was the case with
> 2001: A Space Odyssey as well as many books by Asimov (and one of the ideas
> behind the so-called "zeroth law of robotics" in his books).
> 

Ah! The good Doctor and his Gentle Reader along with Arthur C Clarke 
were the favourite authors of my childhood.

You would know better than me about error and infinite loop trapping.
Still how can a fulcrum be evil?

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: More failure
Date: 4 Mar 2010 04:25:01
Message: <4b8f7c6d$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:

> It seems the job I've been pinning all my hopes on isn't going to 
> materialise after all. For reasons unknown, the agency isn't going to 
> put my CV forward. I can only assume I was too greedy and asked for too 
> much money.

On Monday, a recruiter phoned me and said he wanted to put my CV forward 

for, even in MK.


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: failure?
Date: 4 Mar 2010 10:47:12
Message: <4b8fd600$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:

> On Monday, a recruiter phoned me and said he wanted to put my CV forward 

> for, even in MK.

Woah, wait a sec... I have a telephone interview tomorrow! o_O


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: More failure
Date: 4 Mar 2010 13:17:15
Message: <4b8ff92b@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:25:01 +0000, Invisible wrote:

> Invisible wrote:
> 
>> It seems the job I've been pinning all my hopes on isn't going to
>> materialise after all. For reasons unknown, the agency isn't going to
>> put my CV forward. I can only assume I was too greedy and asked for too
>> much money.
> 
> On Monday, a recruiter phoned me and said he wanted to put my CV forward
> for a job offering... £28k. So apparently it's a reasonable sum to ask
> for, even in MK.

Sounds like a positive development. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: failure?
Date: 4 Mar 2010 13:17:44
Message: <4b8ff948$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:47:12 +0000, Invisible wrote:

> Invisible wrote:
> 
>> On Monday, a recruiter phoned me and said he wanted to put my CV
>> forward for a job offering... £28k. So apparently it's a reasonable sum
>> to ask for, even in MK.
> 
> Woah, wait a sec... I have a telephone interview tomorrow! o_O

You'll do fine. :-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: failure?
Date: 4 Mar 2010 15:52:37
Message: <4b901d95$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
> 
>> On Monday, a recruiter phoned me and said he wanted to put my CV 

>> sum to ask for, even in MK.
> 
> Woah, wait a sec... I have a telephone interview tomorrow! o_O

Well done, try to take it on a land line much better than having an 
interview on a mobile. Have a cup of something to hand and your CV so 
you can refer to the lies you told. :)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: failure?
Date: 5 Mar 2010 04:07:47
Message: <4b90c9e3$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

> Have a cup of something to hand and your CV so 
> you can refer to the lies you told. :)

Oh. Yeah, that would be a good idea. Hmm, I wonder if I can get my CV 
back off Monster...


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: failure?
Date: 5 Mar 2010 04:43:34
Message: <4b90d246@news.povray.org>
>> Have a cup of something to hand and your CV so you can refer to the 
>> lies you told. :)
> 
> Oh. Yeah, that would be a good idea. Hmm, I wonder if I can get my CV 
> back off Monster...

Oh goodie. I can't remember my password. >_<

(If I was at home, I'd have it written down...)

Fortunately the post I made here last month with a draft of my CV hasn't 
expired yet. I don't think I changed it *that* much since then...

It's all going swimmingly. :-/


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 9 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.