|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Don't wages vary depending on which country you work in though?
Yes, but the euro isn't *that* different from the dollar.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> Andrew gets free healthcare and probably a lot more paid
> vacation than you did there, not to mention the cost of living, taxes
Sure. But to be paid 20 years later (after several years of experience) at a
wholesale rate lower than I was taking home?
(Plus, we do have health care here. It's just not through the government.)
And I suspect his taxes are higher than mine were, too. I.e., many of those
considerations are in the wrong direction. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> POSIX doesn't define only system calls.
But once you're posix-compliant enough to compile all the utilities, what
else is there? I.e., if all my APIs are posix compliant and all my #include
files are posix-compliant, what am I missing?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:4b686df2@news.povray.org...
> DungBeatle wrote:
> > I wouldn't say "used to," it's slang. I would say,
> > "accustomed to."
>
> Huh. I wouldn't have said that. "Accustomed" is more
formal, but "used to"
> is just fine I think. Sometimes one can go too far in
being formal, to the
> point where one starts saying "utilize" instead of "use"
even when it means
> the wrong thing, etc.
21 years at a university, just habits... :)
~db
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
DungBeatle wrote:
> 21 years at a university, just habits... :)
Sure. As I said, it's much more formal. That doesn't mean "used to" is
slang. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2-2-2010 10:10, Invisible wrote:
>>> He's asking what city you're in.
>>
>> Because I know he lives in Milton Keynes, I doubt if that counts as a
>> real city.
>
> WTF?
>
> It's a major urban center. Of *course* it counts as a city!
>
> (It even has its own "cathedral" - although IMHO it's not really worthy
> of the title.)
Perhaps city is used in a slightly different meaning in English than
here. Actually I would be surprised if we meant the same thing. For me a
city needs at least an identifiable center with an active cultural scene
and a general feeling of being more part of the world than of the county
it happens to be in.
Where I live has a name that suggest that it is a city , 'Zaanstad'
where 'stad' means city (and 'Zaan' is the name of our river). Everybody
understands that that is a joke or at best something we would wish to
be, though perhaps there are a few people paid to try to suggest to the
world at large that we are a real city. This is simply a collection of
small towns and villages.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:15:42 +0100, andrel wrote:
> Perhaps city is used in a slightly different meaning in English than
> here.
It does have different meanings in English - but in general, a city is
nothing more than a population centre with a name.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Strike a light - I enquired about a vacancy on the Haskell mailing list,
and actually got a response for the first time ever! o_O
Currently in discussions with a friendly guy who's looking to hire a
programmer. We'll see if this leads anywhere...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:19:55 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Currently in discussions with a friendly guy who's looking to hire a
> programmer. We'll see if this leads anywhere...
Could be just the thing you were looking for. Good luck!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Sure. But to be paid 20 years later (after several years of experience) at
> a wholesale rate lower than I was taking home?
A new graduate in the UK will be getting 20-30K pounds, that equates to
$25-$35k take home pay.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |