 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Strike a light - I enquired about a vacancy on the Haskell mailing list,
> and actually got a response for the first time ever! o_O
>
> Currently in discussions with a friendly guy who's looking to hire a
> programmer. We'll see if this leads anywhere...
>
If you are looking for a reference...
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> If you are looking for a reference...
...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> If you are looking for a reference...
>
> ....
>
I'll give you one, reference that is.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'll give you one
O_O
> reference that is.
Oh, right.
Hokey, that makes 2 references now...
(Otherwise it would have made 2 offers from men, which would be a Bad
Thing.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> I'll give you one
>
> O_O
>
>> reference that is.
>
> Oh, right.
>
> Hokey, that makes 2 references now...
>
> (Otherwise it would have made 2 offers from men, which would be a Bad
> Thing.)
>
Don't knock it unless you've tried it ;)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I keep trying to find that one episode of QC where Raven plans to
increase business using sex... but since all the strips have titles
which are part of the punchline rather than being descriptive, and
Google can't read image text, it's proving nearly impossible to find. :-(
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-2-2010 21:29, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:53:30 +0000, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> Whatever, it's no secret that I'm underpaid.
>
> True - but as we've said before, when you look for a new job, don't use
> your current pay as an assumed base, especially when considering where
> you can afford to live. Your current salary has no bearing on that -
> it's what you'll make in the new job that has the most bearing on what
> you'll be able to afford.
If you put it that way it seems to make sense. No wonder that we have
repeatedly tried to get it into his thick head. I wonder why that didn't
work...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:36:19 +0100, andrel wrote:
> If you put it that way it seems to make sense.
If I'm starting to make sense, be afraid....be very afraid. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:48:50 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> I'll give you one
>>
>> O_O
>>
>>> reference that is.
>>
>> Oh, right.
>>
>> Hokey, that makes 2 references now...
>>
>> (Otherwise it would have made 2 offers from men, which would be a Bad
>> Thing.)
>>
>>
> Don't knock it unless you've tried it ;)
LOL
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:36:19 +0100, andrel wrote:
>
>> If you put it that way it seems to make sense.
>
> If I'm starting to make sense, be afraid....be very afraid. ;-)
>
LOL
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
