Warp wrote:

>   The joys of spaghetti code. Structured programming and especially
> modularity is for wimps.

That's right. Because writing utterly incomprehensible code structured 
in the most complicated way possible proves how clever you are, right?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>> Though I have to admit when I read your reply to me about smallptGPU 
>> about "hey, I have an idea" I had a gut instinct of calling you a sad 
>> old man. :)
> 
> It's kind of a running joke, given that someone without any knowledge of 
> how POV works internally suggests that all of POV could be sped up by 
> porting it to GPUs about twice a year or so.

I'm aware of that which is why I hinted at using it to speed up just 
pov's ray-triangle intersections.

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> 
>>   The joys of spaghetti code. Structured programming and especially
>> modularity is for wimps.
> 
> That's right. Because writing utterly incomprehensible code structured 
> in the most complicated way possible proves how clever you are, right?

No, you're not clever enough while you haven't written a Haskell monoid 
using nothing but closures. :)

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
>> and could be framing me. :P
> 
> What? Don't make yourself more important than you are.

yes, I guess that was a bit paranoid. :P

Post a reply to this message