![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> And our favorite YouTube critic is back:
This one wasn't nearly as good a criticism. He really didn't make any points
that everyone wasn't aware of, methinks.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> This one wasn't nearly as good a criticism. He really didn't make any points
> that everyone wasn't aware of, methinks.
I haven't realized all the "looks like a cat with human lips" thing before.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I haven't realized all the "looks like a cat with human lips" thing before.
Fair enough. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Neeum Zawan" <m.n### [at] ieee org> wrote in message
news:4b58ecf0@news.povray.org...
> On 01/13/10 22:11, Darren New wrote:
> > Pretty but cliche.
> Agreed. Not an ounce of originality in the story.
Just saw it. Visuals are very impressive (although flora and fauna were not
imaginative at all, execution was great). In fact, I was wishing the entire
time that there were no storyline, no actors, no dialog (all of which
sucked) - just the CGI tour de force and some good classical music in the
background. It would have made a much more enjoyable experience.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"somebody" <x### [at] y com> wrote in message news:4b68e922@news.povray.org...
>
> Just saw it. Visuals are very impressive (although flora and fauna were
> not
> imaginative at all, execution was great). In fact, I was wishing the
> entire
> time that there were no storyline, no actors, no dialog (all of which
> sucked) - just the CGI tour de force and some good classical music in the
> background. It would have made a much more enjoyable experience.
>
Do I hear a mash-up coming on? :-D
--
Jack
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |