 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>> ...the program uses the GTK+ look and feel, rather than behaving like a
>> native Windows application?
>
> I'm pretty sure Gimp on Windows uses the Windows (2000) look and feel.
AFAIK, GTK+ looks like Windows using the same technique as Java Swing:
implementing the theme from scratch to look like that.
And that is when you notice subtle Windows details that you don't normally
notice... when Swing gets them wrong.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I'm pretty sure you have to blame Microsoft itself for that. Isn't open()
> defined in msvcrt.dll?
Now that you mention it, quite possibly yes. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Heh, well, the *really* fun thing is when you have to install GTK+
>> before the program will run... We all know what happens then. ;-)
>
> In Linux you have to install GTK+ before the program will run too. The
> difference is that Linux distros have package managers that make it sane.
More correctly: The difference is that on Linux, *lots* of programs use
GTK+, not just the GIMP. ;-)
Actually, one of the more perplexing things about Linux is how different
widget toolkits look and behave completely differently. Things seem to
have got more sane over there recently, thank God...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
