|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:
> > Warp wrote:
> > > How many triangles can you find in the attached image?
>
> > 25 - somehow I feel odd compared to the rest of you
>
> I'm curious: Where do you see the 25th triangle?
>
> --
Whole!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Tom Austin <taustin> wrote:
>> Warp wrote:
>>> How many triangles can you find in the attached image?
>
>> 25 - somehow I feel odd compared to the rest of you
>
> I'm curious: Where do you see the 25th triangle?
>
due to my counting method I double counted one.
specifically the large bottom one
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
come on, Warp! Quit fooling around and say how many there are. and where's the
prize? :D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"gregjohn" <pte### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>
> Whole!
<redacted>
I only get 25 if I mistakenly double count the whole. Latest belief is that
there are only 24.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:4b26c988@news.povray.org...
> How many triangles can you find in the attached image?
I found 24...
--
Jack
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Triangles.png' (66 KB)
Preview of image 'Triangles.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:37:20 -0500, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:26:00 -0500, Warp wrote:
>
>> How many triangles can you find in the attached image?
>
> I count 21.
>
> Jim
Amended to 24 now, I found the other three.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/14/2009 11:26 PM, Warp wrote:
> How many triangles can you find in the attached image?
>
Excluding degenerate triangles,
it looks like there is indeed 24.
However, one more "triangle" could be found:
as a substring of the file name "triangles.png",
so total is 25 then.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '24triangles.pdf' (141 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15-12-2009 20:29, nemesis wrote:
> come on, Warp! Quit fooling around and say how many there are. and where's the
> prize? :D
>
>
More importantly, what did we learn from this and why did you, warp,
post this?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> More importantly, what did we learn from this and why did you, warp,
> post this?
Does everything have to have a reason behind it? Can't things be done just
for the fun of it?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15-12-2009 22:41, Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>> More importantly, what did we learn from this and why did you, warp,
>> post this?
>
> Does everything have to have a reason behind it?
Not always, but seemed to me a rather random post.
> Can't things be done just for the fun of it?
It would be much interesting for particularly this group if it had a
theory of how we perceive things and what we don't see behind it. I was
a bit hoping for something like that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |