Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> They could have saved me a whole heap of trouble if this were written
> down somewhere.

Report it, then. Or even send them a patch, if the documentation source 
files are available.

Post a reply to this message

Darren New schrieb:
> Invisible wrote:
>> That's almost as good as the threadDelay function, that doesn't tell 
>> you whether the argument is seconds or miliseconds or picoseconds or...
> 
> Probably biliseconds.

Billyseconds?

Post a reply to this message

clipka a écrit :

> Darren New schrieb:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> That's almost as good as the threadDelay function, that doesn't tell
>>> you whether the argument is seconds or miliseconds or picoseconds or...
>>
>> Probably biliseconds.
> 
> Billyseconds?

no, bilisecond, from the USA/MS nomenclature :
 bil : 1000 mil   (million, billion...)
and the isecond unit (inverted second)

milisecond is 1/1000 second,
so bilisecond is 1000 times that, 1/1000000 s.

(From the thread about MS api)

I now expect a precision of femtosecond in timestamps...

Post a reply to this message