 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I especially liked how in one release they deprecated a set of methods
> and provided replacements, and in the next release they deprecated the
> new set and UNdeprecated the originals! o_O
That's OK. The media player I'm interfacing to deprecated a whole slew of
methods in favor of methods they haven't implemented yet. I must say, that's
a first in my experience.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> ...so what you're saying is, Java ended up being big server-side rather
> than client-side?
>
> Oh, the irony of designing a language that works anywhere, and then only
> running it in one place. ;-)
Like, in Sun servers, IBM machines, Windows or Linux boxes? etc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> I especially liked how in one release they deprecated a set of methods
>> and provided replacements, and in the next release they deprecated the
>> new set and UNdeprecated the originals! o_O
>
> That's OK. The media player I'm interfacing to deprecated a whole slew
> of methods in favor of methods they haven't implemented yet. I must say,
> that's a first in my experience.
That's friggin 31337!!
Still, at least they only deprecated rather than *remoted* stuff. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> http://golang.org/
Overhyped? I'm still happy I decided on Python next.
http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2009/09/15/100000_tasklets.html
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Hmmm. Interesting. (Three people have told me about this already. :)
That's Google Hype-Generating Marketing Machine at work!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
> > http://golang.org/
>
> Overhyped? I'm still happy I decided on Python next.
>
>
http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2009/09/15/100000_tasklets.html
That's really cool. And it's cooler that spython is faster without even needing
an explicit compilation step. :)
I have to say once they announced go, I wondered how would Erlang compare...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> ...so what you're saying is, Java ended up being big server-side rather
>> than client-side?
>>
>> Oh, the irony of designing a language that works anywhere, and then only
>> running it in one place. ;-)
>
> Like, in Sun servers, IBM machines, Windows or Linux boxes? etc
Yeah, but I mean if you're working server-side, you just have to compile
the thing for whatever platform your server runs. You don't need dynamic
runtime portability.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
